Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Photos and article

January 22, 2004 10:57PM
ET&WNC #10 & #14, which according to ET&WNC records were purchased by the USATC for use on the WP&Y in May, 1942. According to shop pictures and information. The ET&WNC was going through the process of over hauling its 4 large ten-wheelers, 10,11,12, and 14. #10 was completed first and return to service in Jan 1942. #14 was in the middle of overhaul work when the engine was purchased. If u look at the photos the #14 is nice and clean and #10 is dirty when they were on the flat cars. Ironically the engines were shipped w/o whistles. #10 and #14's whistle are still in the south. But from what we gathered is that #10 and #14 when they arrived at WP they had to under go modifications and some routine maintence. Some reports have indicated that some boiler work was done on #14. Which could be possible if the overhaul work was not finished in Tennessee. #10 did go into service almost a month before #14. #10 was the most powerful of the ET&WNC ten-wheelers, it had a 3/32 extra lead on the inlet ports in the cylinders. The other 3 did not. Saidly these engines were lost in the roundhouse fire of 1943. They were good little engines, I run the #12 at Tweetsie, it totally blows the #190 out of the water when it comes to pulling. I would trade #190 for another ET 4-6-0.
Subject Author Posted

ET&WNC 10 & 14 *LINK*

WP&Ymike January 20, 2004 11:01PM

Re: ET&WNC 10 & 14

rick b January 21, 2004 01:53AM

There was a lot of confusion in those days.

Bruce Pryor January 21, 2004 09:44PM

Re: There was a lot of confusion in those days.

WP&Ymike January 22, 2004 12:42AM

it is Trains Sept '43

WP&Ymike January 22, 2004 12:53AM

Re: it is Trains Sept '43

rick b January 22, 2004 01:30AM

in WP&YR service Sept '42

WP&Ymike January 22, 2004 01:59AM

Re: There was a lot of confusion in those days.

rick b January 22, 2004 01:05AM

Re: There was a lot of confusion in those days.

WP&Ymike January 22, 2004 01:40AM

Re: There was a lot of confusion in those days.

rick b January 22, 2004 11:31AM

Photos and article *LINK*

Bruce Pryor January 22, 2004 08:09AM

Re: Photos and article

Tim S January 22, 2004 10:57PM

10 & 14 vs 190s

WP&Ymike January 23, 2004 02:35AM

Re: 190 tenderss

Brian Norden January 24, 2004 03:07PM

Re: 190 tenderss

Tim S January 24, 2004 11:00PM

Re: 190 tenders

WP&Ymike January 24, 2004 11:47PM

Re: 190 tenders

Tim S January 24, 2004 11:59PM

Re: 190 tenders

WP&Ymike January 25, 2004 12:27AM

190 oil tender photo

Bruce Pryor January 25, 2004 09:41PM

Re: 190 oil tender photo *LINK*

Brian Norden January 25, 2004 11:01PM

Re: 190 oil tender photo

WP&Ymike January 25, 2004 11:31PM

Re: 190 oil tender photo

Bruce Pryor January 26, 2004 06:37AM

Re: 190 oil tender photo *LINK*

Tim S January 26, 2004 03:15PM

Another 190 photo for Tim *NM* *PIC*

Bruce Pryor January 26, 2004 10:10PM

Re: Photos and article

Casey Carlson January 24, 2004 12:50PM

Re: Really.....

Jerry Huck January 24, 2004 01:34PM

Re: Really.....

Casey Carlson January 24, 2004 03:07PM

Re: Really.....

jbbane January 24, 2004 03:22PM

JB, you forgot

RBrinton January 24, 2004 05:56PM

Re: JB, you forgot

jbbane January 24, 2004 07:13PM

Re: JB, you forgot

Taylor Rush January 25, 2004 12:13PM

Re: JB, you forgot

jbbane January 25, 2004 06:04PM

Re: JB,That was Catapiller

RBrinton January 25, 2004 09:03PM

So I shouldn't mention

James R. Temple January 25, 2004 09:47PM

Don't go this far with the Heisler streamlining! *NM* *LINK* *PIC*

Bruce Pryor January 25, 2004 10:50PM

Re: Photos and article

WP&Ymike January 24, 2004 01:46PM

Re: Photos and article *LINK*

Tim S January 24, 2004 11:17PM

Re: Photos and article *PIC*

WP&Ymike January 25, 2004 12:18AM

Re: Photos and article

Tim S January 25, 2004 12:40AM

Engine House Registers

WP&Ymike January 25, 2004 12:50AM

Thanks, Mike

Bruce Pryor January 25, 2004 10:53PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.