Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Can D&RGW 483 be the me too 168?

August 15, 2018 07:59AM
I'm curious of something? Has anyone in this thread actually volunteered to work on 483?

I did work on 483 a few years ago during a Friend's work session. Needle scaling an out of service locomotive is a filthy job!

There are major parts missing however they are on the property. Compared to where the poor thing was at 6-7 years ago, it's looking a lot better. The entire boiler shell was then given a protective coating to prevent deterioration.

From what the current shop guys said, a rebuild would involve remove and replace interior boiler sheets. A crane would be needed to take the boiler off to accomplish. There's plenty of know how among the Friends to rebuild it however there isn't enough volunteers. Grants from historic groups could likely be obtained to purchase the materials.

There are 4 K36 already running that run the tourist operation.168 is a special project that's adding a missing level of history on either the C&T or D&S. A big kudos to John Bush for the vision of making sure this piece of history is not only preserved but soon operational. 463 was paid for by donations and the Friends. How about a group similar to the 315 guys for 483? The reality is the nixed swap was the best way to get 483 running. In fact, it likely would have been in operation already.
Subject Author Posted

Can D&RGW 483 be the me too 168?

craig August 14, 2018 09:35AM

Re: Can D&RGW 483 be the me too 168?

cdaspit August 14, 2018 09:53AM

Re: Can D&RGW 483 be the me too 168?

Ross Miller August 14, 2018 10:12AM

Re: Can D&RGW 483 be the me too 168?

Tomstp August 14, 2018 10:17AM

Re: Can D&RGW 483 be the me too 168?

Ross Miller August 14, 2018 10:24AM

Re: Can D&RGW 483 be the me too 168?

Rich Murray August 14, 2018 11:41AM

Re: Can D&RGW 483 be the me too 168?

guymonmd August 14, 2018 12:09PM

Re: Can D&RGW 483 be the me too 168?

Popeye8762 August 14, 2018 12:26PM

Re: Can D&RGW 483 be the me too 168?

drgwk37 August 14, 2018 12:31PM

Re: Can D&RGW 483 be the me too 168?

Ross Miller August 14, 2018 01:22PM

Re: Can D&RGW 483 be the me too 168?

Rich Murray August 14, 2018 01:33PM

Re: Can D&RGW 483 be the me too 168?

Volvoguy87 August 14, 2018 01:41PM

Re: Can D&RGW 483 be the me too 168?

Tomstp August 14, 2018 02:34PM

Re: Can D&RGW 483 be the me too 168?

Popeye8762 August 14, 2018 04:53PM

Re: Can D&RGW 483 be the me too 168? Attachments

Chris Walker August 14, 2018 05:01PM

Re: Can D&RGW 483 be the me too 168? Attachments

Jerry474 August 14, 2018 05:49PM

Re: Can D&RGW 483 be the me too 168?

Volvoguy87 August 15, 2018 09:32AM

Re: Can D&RGW 483 be the me too 168?

Earl August 15, 2018 01:21PM

Re: Can D&RGW 483 be the me too 168?

SR_Krause August 17, 2018 07:07AM

Re: Can D&RGW 483 be the me too 168?

Chris Walker August 17, 2018 03:39PM

Re: Can D&RGW 483 be the me too 168?

SR_Krause August 17, 2018 08:14PM

Re: Can D&RGW 483 be the me too 168?

guymonmd August 15, 2018 11:06AM

It's Not Just Another K-36

Eddy Sand August 14, 2018 04:54PM

Re: It's Not Just Another K-36

Chris Walker August 14, 2018 05:22PM

Re: It's Not Just Another K-36

Eddy Sand August 15, 2018 09:04AM

Re: It's Not Just Another K-36

Chris Walker August 16, 2018 03:52AM

Seriously?

Kevin Cook August 16, 2018 12:27PM

Re: It's Not Just Another K-36

Volvoguy87 August 15, 2018 10:36AM

Re: It's Not Just Another K-36

Rich Murray August 15, 2018 11:18AM

Re: #483 - better Running in Durango than Rusting in Chama thumbs upthumbs up Attachments

Russo Loco August 16, 2018 01:11AM

Re: #483 - better Running in Durango than Rusting in Chama thumbs upthumbs up

Rich Murray August 16, 2018 07:26AM

Re: #483 - better Running in Durango than Rusting in Chama thumbs upthumbs up

cdaspit August 16, 2018 09:19AM

Re: #483 - better Running in Durango than Rusting in Chama thumbs upthumbs up

Will Gant August 16, 2018 09:53AM

Re: #483 - better Running in Durango than Rusting in Chama thumbs upthumbs up

hsuthe August 16, 2018 11:16AM

AMEN

Kevin Cook August 16, 2018 12:30PM

Re: Can D&RGW 483 be the me too 168?

NGJunkie August 14, 2018 06:48PM

Re: Can D&RGW 483 be the me too 168?

Jerry474 August 14, 2018 06:51PM

Re: Can D&RGW 483 be the me too 168?

Earl August 14, 2018 06:00PM

Re: Can D&RGW 483 be the me too 168?

Tomstp August 14, 2018 08:08PM

Re: Can D&RGW 483 be the me too 168?

Will Gant August 14, 2018 10:43PM

Re: Can D&RGW 483 be the me too 168?

JoeK August 15, 2018 07:59AM

Re: Can D&RGW 483 be the me too 168?

Will Gant August 15, 2018 09:46AM

Re: Can D&RGW 483 be the me too 168?

jeffsmith August 15, 2018 10:17AM

Re: Can D&RGW 483 be the me too 168?

michael August 15, 2018 05:41PM

Re: Can D&RGW 483 be the me too 168?

Casey Akin August 15, 2018 10:55PM

Re: Can D&RGW 483 be the me too 168?

Earl August 16, 2018 10:01PM

clarification on Can D&RGW 483 be the me too 168?

craig August 17, 2018 09:28AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login