Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: D&RGW C-19 340-349 tractive effort

April 25, 2016 07:38PM
Andrew Roth Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hi,
> I was reading the website below and it lists two
> different tractive effort ratings for some of
> these locomotives.
>
> [www.drgw.org]
>
>
> Was the tractive effort increased to 18,947 lbs
> when they were converted back to narrow gauge (or
> was the the tractive effort in its early years
> and the 17,055 lbs its tractive effort in its
> later years) ?
> Sincerely,
> Andy

Tractive effort would've been increased when the 400's were re-boilered. As-built they would've most likely been delivered with the same 130lbs pressure that most other Baldwins of the time were being built with, meaning something like 15,700 T.E. given 36 inch driving wheels. 145 pounds would've been really unusual with wrought iron boilers. The later class 70's (417-422) ordered in 1886-1887 had 130 pounds boiler pressure and 36 inch drivers as-built, per their spec sheets. These later engines were built with steel boilers and I believe were eventually raised to 145 pounds or therabout while retaining their original boilers.


17,055 corresponds to 145 pounds boiler pressure with 37 inch diameter driving wheels (thicker tires than as-built). 18,819 works out to 160 pounds boiler pressure with the 37 inch drivers as well--obviously a post-rebuild value.
Subject Author Posted

D&RGW C-19 340-349

risrwy April 12, 2016 11:31PM

Re: D&RGW C-19 340-349

Mark Huber April 13, 2016 01:24AM

Re: D&RGW C-19 340-349

Herb Kelsey April 13, 2016 09:47PM

Re: D&RGW C-19 340-349

risrwy April 13, 2016 10:11PM

Re: D&RGW C-19 340-349

Casey Akin April 13, 2016 10:14PM

Re: D&RGW C-19 340-349

Herb Kelsey April 16, 2016 01:24AM

Re: D&RGW C-19 340-349 Attachments

Chris Walker April 16, 2016 03:58AM

Re: D&RGW C-19 340-349

Casey Akin April 16, 2016 02:40PM

Re: D&RGW C-19 340-349

HAICH OMANDIER April 16, 2016 05:10PM

Re: D&RGW C-19 340-349

Jeff Taylor April 17, 2016 11:37AM

Re: D&RGW C-19 340-349

John W. Buchanan April 24, 2016 06:08AM

Re: D&RGW C-19 340-349 Attachments

Jeff Taylor April 25, 2016 09:29AM

Re: D&RGW C-19 340-349

jalbers April 25, 2016 09:49AM

Re: D&RGW C-19 340-349

Casey Akin April 25, 2016 07:41PM

Re: D&RGW C-19 340-349

John W. Buchanan April 26, 2016 05:24AM

Re: D&RGW C-19 340-349 tractive effort

Andrew Roth April 25, 2016 05:59PM

Re: D&RGW C-19 340-349 tractive effort

dougvv April 25, 2016 07:35PM

Re: D&RGW C-19 340-349 tractive effort

James April 25, 2016 07:38PM

Re: D&RGW C-19 340-349 tractive effort

Andrew Roth April 26, 2016 06:43AM

Re: D&RGW C-19 340-349 tractive effort

Jeff Taylor April 26, 2016 12:36PM

Re: D&RGW C-19 340-349 tractive effort

Chris Walker April 26, 2016 02:57PM

Re: D&RGW C-19 340-349 tractive effort

Scott Gibbs April 26, 2016 05:09PM

Re: D&RGW C-19 340-349 tractive effort

dougvv April 27, 2016 12:17PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login