Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Sumpter #250, 251

August 28, 2015 07:48PM
Hi Kevin,

As Bret stated, the Sumpter Valley mainline was extensively upgraded in the years prior to the arrival of the mallets, so axle loading limitations were not really a problem.

However, you are correct in your assumption that visibility and range was a concern. As related to me by a former Oregon Lumber Company engineer and proven by some great early photos of the mallets on the SVRy, tenders were added but the side-tanks retained until it was established the mallets could make it between water stops utilizing tender capacity alone. At that point, the side-tanks were removed and scrap rail added under the running boards to mimic the weight (and thus adhesion) that fully loaded side-tanks once provided. Some trial and error ensued until the right weight/balance was achieved. I'm sure Bret, Jim Grigsby, Taylor Rush and others could provide more insight or photos on this subject.

Casey
Subject Author Posted

Sumpter #250, 251

MSRRKevin August 28, 2015 11:51AM

Re: Sumpter #250, 251

Bill Pratt August 28, 2015 01:22PM

Re: Sumpter #250, 251

J.B.Bane August 28, 2015 05:47PM

Re: Sumpter #250, 251

Casey S. Carlson August 28, 2015 07:48PM

Re: Sumpter #250, 251- PHOTOS of #250 With Tanks & Tender! Attachments

LOGGERHOGGER August 29, 2015 07:23AM

Re: Sumpter #250, 251- PHOTOS of #250 With Tanks & Tender!

Skip August 29, 2015 01:34PM

Re: Sumpter #250, 251- PHOTOS of #250 With Tanks & Tender!

jim pallow August 29, 2015 05:14PM

Re: Sumpter #250, 251- PHOTOS of #250 With Tanks & Tender!

whitepasser September 04, 2015 01:51PM

Re: Sumpter #250, 251- PHOTOS of #250 With Tanks & Tender!

J.B.Bane September 04, 2015 02:25PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login