Re: Union Iron Works Locomotives

Andrew Davis Wrote:
=======================================================
> Hmmm, that is strange to see the BM&L listed as an
> 0-6-0T. I'm sure Mr. Ferrell did his research, but
> it does make me wonder.
> Though I do know that their proposed replacement
> locomotive was to be an 0-6-0T.
>
> As for it being described as a "dummy" similar to
> the Austin City Ry's "Mule's Relief" is something
> I hadn't considered. And in retrospect I reckon it
> makes a little more sense if the John D Hall was a
> 2-4-0T.

A number of steam dummies had a trailing truck under/behind the firebox. An 0-4-2T perhaps? JP