Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Superheated side valves (NNG)

November 30, 2014 08:34AM
Rich, that is an interesting thought on the steam pressure. Allow me to share something regarding the Red River and Gulf, Crowell and Spencer Lumber Co. locomotives, that may (or may not) shed some light on this.
The two companies operated a common carrier (RR&G) railroad, and also hauled log trains up to 45 miles over the same RR using the lumber co. engines. Grades were up to 2%, and train length was limited to 18-20 cars. Between 1915 and 1923 the companies bought 6 new 4-6-0's from Baldwin for their operations. The first two were class 10-30-D (18 X 26 cylinders) and the last 4 were class 10-32 D (19 X 26 cylinders). All had 52" drivers, walschaerts valve gear, 180# BP and weighed virtually the same. As each engine was built, there were modifications and "improvements".

Here they are in order built with their "improvements"

RR&G #102, 10-30-D, 1915, Wood burner, saturated, balanced slide valves, alligator crosshead, single 9.5" air pump, diamond stack

RR&G #103, 10-30-D, 1918, wood burner, superheated, piston valves, alligator crosshead, single 9.5' air pump, Rushton stack.

C&SL #400, 10-32-D, 1919, wood burner, superheated, piston valves, alligator crosshead, single 9.5' air pump, Rushton stack

C&SL #300, 10-32-D, 1920, coal burner, superheated, piston valves, alligator crosshead, twin 9.5" air pumps

RR&G #105, 10-32-D, 1922, oil burner, saturated, balanced slide valves, multiple bearing cross head, 9.5" cross compound air pump

RR&G #106, 10-32-D, 1923, oil burner, superheated, piston valves, multiple bearing cross head, 9.5" cross compound air pump

I find the various mix on what they did on the engines, an when they did it most interesting. All non oil burners were converted to oil between 1923 an 1924, an all engines with only an single air pump were given an additional 9.5" or 11" pump at that time also.

#102 left early in the 1930s, and the 103 at the end of the decade.

#105 was retired in 1945, and the 300 in 1948. #400 and #106 were retained until the end of common carrier operations in 1953.

I have asked numerous "steam people" as to why that the 105 was built late in the series and was not superheated but have never gotten an answer.

The only things that I can glean from all of this is that as traffic dwindled, the smaller engines went first in the 1930's, then when the operations were cut back from 65 miles to less than 20 miles, the saturated engine was scrapped and only the superheated ones were retained until the end.

It is an interesting story, and I have often thought about writing some of it up for a magazine, but I surely would like to have more in the way of answers. Your comment about superheat not being of much value in engines with less than 200# BP may explain some of their thinking.

As a side note with all of this, all of the engines that I am familiar with on the Texas State RR are less than 200# pressure but even on a 20 mph railroad of only 25 miles, the single saturated engine boils up a significantly greater volume of water on every trip.
Subject Author Posted

464

davidtltc November 26, 2014 09:37AM

Re: 464

wcohen November 26, 2014 11:58AM

Re: 464

Bruce R. Pier November 26, 2014 12:01PM

Re: 464

szuiderveen November 26, 2014 01:22PM

Re: 464

rehunn November 26, 2014 02:58PM

Re: 464

Roger Mitchell November 26, 2014 06:19PM

Re: 464

John C November 26, 2014 05:30PM

Re: 464

Bill Pratt November 26, 2014 08:08PM

Re: 464

rehunn November 26, 2014 08:40PM

Re: 464

J.B.Bane November 26, 2014 08:57PM

Re: 464

davidtltc November 27, 2014 08:10AM

Re: 464

trainrider47 November 27, 2014 09:14AM

Re: 464

Dave J November 27, 2014 09:47AM

super heater spotting feature Attachments

trainrider47 November 26, 2014 09:19PM

Re: super heater spotting feature

Bill Pratt November 26, 2014 09:32PM

Re: super heater spotting feature

J.B.Bane November 26, 2014 09:42PM

Re: super heater spotting feature

Bill Pratt November 26, 2014 09:48PM

Re: super heater spotting feature

jgunning November 27, 2014 07:52AM

Re: super heater spotting feature Attachments

davidtltc November 27, 2014 08:02AM

Re: super heater spotting feature

trainrider47 November 27, 2014 08:59AM

K-36 super heater spotting feature Attachments

davidtltc November 27, 2014 08:01AM

Re: K-36 super heater spotting feature

trainrider47 November 27, 2014 09:04AM

Re: K-27 super heater spotting feature Attachments

ROW Explorer November 27, 2014 07:57PM

Re: K-27 super heater spotting feature

trainrider47 November 28, 2014 10:24AM

Re: super heater spotting feature

rehunn November 27, 2014 10:05AM

Superheated side valves (NNG)

hank November 27, 2014 11:57AM

Re: Superheated side valves (NNG)

rehunn November 27, 2014 01:14PM

Re: Superheated slide valves (NNG)

hank November 28, 2014 10:20AM

Re: Superheated slide valves (NNG)

rehunn November 28, 2014 10:44AM

Re: Superheated side valves (NNG) Attachments

Everett Lueck November 27, 2014 08:24PM

Re: Superheated side valves (NNG)

Earl November 28, 2014 11:23AM

Re: Superheated side valves (NNG)

Everett Lueck November 28, 2014 02:00PM

Re: Superheated side valves (NNG)

rehunn November 28, 2014 02:36PM

Re: Superheated side valves (NNG)

Everett Lueck November 28, 2014 07:21PM

Re: Superheated side valves (NNG)

rehunn November 28, 2014 07:24PM

Re: Superheated side valves (NNG)

Everett Lueck November 30, 2014 08:34AM

Re: Superheated side valves (NNG)

Tomstp November 30, 2014 10:35AM

Re: Superheated side valves (NNG)

rehunn November 30, 2014 12:20PM

Re: Superheated side valves (NNG)

Everett Lueck November 30, 2014 06:52PM

Re: Superheated side valves (NNG)

rehunn November 30, 2014 07:27PM

Re: 464

Earl November 28, 2014 08:52AM

Re: 462

davidtltc November 28, 2014 09:03AM

Re: 462 (photos link)

rod November 28, 2014 10:00AM

K-27's

davidtltc November 28, 2014 09:18AM

Re: K-27's

rehunn November 28, 2014 10:00AM

Re: 452 details Attachments

Chris Walker November 28, 2014 02:55PM

Re: 452 details

rehunn November 28, 2014 03:27PM

Re: 464

wcohen December 01, 2014 10:38AM

Re: 464

Chris Walker December 01, 2014 02:57PM

Re: 464

rehunn December 01, 2014 03:14PM

Re: 464

wcohen December 01, 2014 03:33PM

Re: 464

davidtltc December 01, 2014 04:46PM

Re: 464

Chris Walker December 01, 2014 06:47PM

Re: 464

hudsonut1 December 01, 2014 10:51PM

Re: 464

Earl December 02, 2014 08:52AM

Re: 464

Paul Dalleska December 02, 2014 10:19AM

Re: 464

dthom8787 December 02, 2014 12:00PM

Re: 464

Donald Foster December 02, 2014 03:59PM

Re: 464

trainrider47 December 03, 2014 09:14AM

Re: 464

dthom8787 December 03, 2014 09:56AM

Re: 464

trainrider47 December 03, 2014 07:25PM

Re: 464

Kelly Anderson December 02, 2014 12:02PM

Re: 464

Tomstp December 02, 2014 02:04PM

Re: 464

rehunn December 02, 2014 03:35PM

Re: 464

Fritz Klinke December 04, 2014 06:49PM

Re: 464

BillD December 05, 2014 12:22PM

Re: 464

szuiderveen December 06, 2014 11:34AM

Re: 464

rehunn December 06, 2014 12:32PM

Re: 464

Earl December 07, 2014 08:13AM

Re: 464

BillD December 07, 2014 11:55AM

Re: 464

dougvv December 07, 2014 01:23PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login