Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: May 2nd 1955

May 31, 2014 12:47PM
The old-timer running the 483 did not look like No. 2 maqn Frank Frantz or No. 3 man Frank Veo from pictures I have seen of them. That is not to say it wasn't one of them.
I have not seen any pictures of senior engineer Charles D. Wilson so it may have been him. He would have been 65-years-old when the run was made.
The younger man on the 489 doesn't look like Frantz or Veo either.
The line was already abandoned when the trip was made. IIRC that could have affected the seniority agreement.
Other factors would be if the Monarch train was running that day and if a narrow gauge crew was working the barrel transfer.
Subject Author Posted

May 2nd 1955

drgwk37 May 30, 2014 08:55PM

Re: May 2nd 1955

CharlieMcCandless May 31, 2014 05:27AM

Re: May 2nd 1955

drgwk37 May 31, 2014 08:18AM

Re: May 2nd 1955

rehunn May 31, 2014 09:32AM

Re: May 2nd 1955

drgwk37 May 31, 2014 09:35AM

Re: May 2nd 1955

Jimmy Blouch May 31, 2014 10:22AM

Re: May 2nd 1955

drgwk37 May 31, 2014 10:36AM

Re: May 2nd 1955

rehunn May 31, 2014 12:35PM

Re: May 2nd 1955

Jimmy Blouch May 31, 2014 05:12PM

Re: May 2nd 1955

CharlieMcCandless May 31, 2014 12:35PM

Re: May 2nd 1955

CharlieMcCandless May 31, 2014 12:47PM

Clate Braswell

CharlieMcCandless May 31, 2014 12:53PM

Re: May 2nd 1955

drgwk37 May 31, 2014 01:37PM

Re: May 2nd 1955

CharlieMcCandless May 31, 2014 06:42PM

The younger hoghead

CharlieMcCandless May 31, 2014 07:11PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login