Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: USA 250-256 [Spoiler Alert: Engineering/Thermodynamics Content]

February 01, 2014 09:13PM
My intent was not for this discussion to go this way, but I cannot say that it has not been interesting just the same. It is not NG but in my part of the woods, the Crowell and Spencer Lumber Co, and the Red River and Gulf RR, which it owned, had a 50-60 mile daily haul. Between 1919 and 1923, the companies ordered 4 virtually identical 4-6-0's from Baldwin. I say virtually identical, because the first two, which were for the lumber company's main line 50 mile daily log haul were superheated and built in 1919 and 1920. The third was built in 1922, for the railroad as their primary locomotive, and despite a number of real improvements, it was built as a saturated engine with balanced slide valves to save on maintainence costs. In less than 10 months, the railroad went back to Baldwin and ordered the fourth engine, and it again was superheated. The fuel and water savings even on the 50-60 mile haul, was much more than the maintainence costs of superheating and the single saturated engine was relegated to the shorter hauls of like 12 miles rather than the longer runs.
Subject Author Posted

USA 250-256 Attachments

Everett Lueck January 30, 2014 08:58PM

Re: USA 250-256

Tom Moungovan January 30, 2014 09:25PM

Re: USA 250-256

m.j.peltier January 30, 2014 09:56PM

Re: USA 250-256

J.B.Bane January 31, 2014 10:20AM

Re: USA 250-256

Tom Moungovan January 31, 2014 02:09PM

Re: USA 250-256

rehunn January 31, 2014 03:19PM

Re: USA 250-256

GeorgeGaskill January 31, 2014 05:00PM

Re: USA 250-256

Tom Moungovan January 31, 2014 06:34PM

Re: USA 250-256 [Spoiler Alert: Engineering/Thermodynamics Content] Attachments

rainbowroute February 01, 2014 10:55AM

Re: USA 250-256 [Spoiler Alert: Engineering/Thermodynamics Content]

rehunn February 01, 2014 04:29PM

Re: USA 250-256 [Spoiler Alert: Engineering/Thermodynamics Content]

Tom Moungovan February 01, 2014 08:28PM

Re: USA 250-256 [Spoiler Alert: Engineering/Thermodynamics Content]

Everett Lueck February 01, 2014 09:13PM

Re: comments to Everett

Tom Moungovan February 02, 2014 01:44AM

Re: comments to Evereett Attachments

Everett Lueck February 02, 2014 08:23AM

Re: comments to Evereett

m.j.peltier February 02, 2014 06:23PM

Re: comments to Evereett

John C May 21, 2014 05:45PM

Three lok trains up the hill

m.j.peltier May 23, 2014 01:06PM

Re: duplicate post-deleted

Tom Moungovan January 31, 2014 06:34PM

Re: duplicate post-deleted

rehunn February 01, 2014 09:15AM

Re: USA 250-256

Jim Grigsby February 01, 2014 12:20PM

Re: USA 250-256

John C May 21, 2014 05:41PM

Re: 190 class gauge

m.j.peltier May 23, 2014 01:11PM

Re: USA 250-256

John C February 04, 2014 02:51PM

Re: USA 250-256

whitepasser February 09, 2014 12:50AM

Re: WP&YR 69

m.j.peltier May 23, 2014 01:15PM

Re: USA 250-256

John C May 23, 2014 03:54PM

Re: USA 250-256

John C May 24, 2014 01:52PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login