Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: USA 250-256

February 01, 2014 12:20PM
> If my memory is correct, she has 19" bore
> cylinders and was
> rated for at or about the same tonnage as the
> smaller versions with
> 17" cylinders. All that potential power going
> to waste.

That is correct Tom, the cylinders are 19" X 20" and the drivers are 44". The Baldwin Mikados were 17" X 22" with 42" drivers. Also the boiler pressure for the Baldwins was 185# vs 170# for the Alcos, presumably to improve the factor of adhesion. We reduced the boiler pressure on 19 to 150# to aleviate wheel slipping. I have never seen a satisfactory explination as to why the SV went with this configuration as the Baldwins had already proven themselves on the line. The Alcos might have been made heavier but in 1920 the SV still had 45# rail.

On good track the Alcos could reach 50+ MPH, which might have been a selling point except that the SV had only two relatively short stretches where this was possible. The locomotives could have been superheated, but the SV was very conservative and probibly thought that, burning wood, the effort would have been wasted.

At any rate, and for whatever reason, they did produce two very good looking locomotives.
Subject Author Posted

USA 250-256 Attachments

Everett Lueck January 30, 2014 08:58PM

Re: USA 250-256

Tom Moungovan January 30, 2014 09:25PM

Re: USA 250-256

m.j.peltier January 30, 2014 09:56PM

Re: USA 250-256

J.B.Bane January 31, 2014 10:20AM

Re: USA 250-256

Tom Moungovan January 31, 2014 02:09PM

Re: USA 250-256

rehunn January 31, 2014 03:19PM

Re: USA 250-256

GeorgeGaskill January 31, 2014 05:00PM

Re: USA 250-256

Tom Moungovan January 31, 2014 06:34PM

Re: USA 250-256 [Spoiler Alert: Engineering/Thermodynamics Content] Attachments

rainbowroute February 01, 2014 10:55AM

Re: USA 250-256 [Spoiler Alert: Engineering/Thermodynamics Content]

rehunn February 01, 2014 04:29PM

Re: USA 250-256 [Spoiler Alert: Engineering/Thermodynamics Content]

Tom Moungovan February 01, 2014 08:28PM

Re: USA 250-256 [Spoiler Alert: Engineering/Thermodynamics Content]

Everett Lueck February 01, 2014 09:13PM

Re: comments to Everett

Tom Moungovan February 02, 2014 01:44AM

Re: comments to Evereett Attachments

Everett Lueck February 02, 2014 08:23AM

Re: comments to Evereett

m.j.peltier February 02, 2014 06:23PM

Re: comments to Evereett

John C May 21, 2014 05:45PM

Three lok trains up the hill

m.j.peltier May 23, 2014 01:06PM

Re: duplicate post-deleted

Tom Moungovan January 31, 2014 06:34PM

Re: duplicate post-deleted

rehunn February 01, 2014 09:15AM

Re: USA 250-256

Jim Grigsby February 01, 2014 12:20PM

Re: USA 250-256

John C May 21, 2014 05:41PM

Re: 190 class gauge

m.j.peltier May 23, 2014 01:11PM

Re: USA 250-256

John C February 04, 2014 02:51PM

Re: USA 250-256

whitepasser February 09, 2014 12:50AM

Re: WP&YR 69

m.j.peltier May 23, 2014 01:15PM

Re: USA 250-256

John C May 23, 2014 03:54PM

Re: USA 250-256

John C May 24, 2014 01:52PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login