Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Nothing against

May 24, 2000 06:06PM
Don, I for one, would like to say I'm not against your line, I'm only concerned with how it affects the C&TS. Most of the guys here are just trying to say how they feel it's going to be. I know you've had a hard fight, and I tip my hat to you. If you can get the line running, great. I'd ride it myself. I can not support it if it would start to hurt the C&TS though. Remember, the guys here are used to seeing many other lines that have failed, and those that make it, and they are very protective of their railroad, so please don't take it negativly.
Subject Author Posted

Creede Branch

Chris Whitmore May 14, 2000 07:23PM

Re: Creede Branch

The Linkman May 15, 2000 09:53AM

Re: Creede Branch

Wade Hall May 15, 2000 07:38PM

Re: Creede Branch

Les Jarrett May 15, 2000 10:22PM

Re: Creede Branch

Bill Malin May 16, 2000 08:07AM

Re: Creede Branch

Dave Boyer May 16, 2000 01:27PM

Re: Creede Branch

Hoss May 16, 2000 08:22PM

Re: Creede Branch

Jim Burrill May 16, 2000 12:28PM

Re: Creede Branch

Don Shank May 22, 2000 03:34PM

Nothing against

Grant Houston May 24, 2000 06:06PM

Re: Nothing against

Don Shank May 25, 2000 10:03AM

Re: Nothing against

Michael Allen May 26, 2000 01:57PM

What about the 169?

Grant Houston May 26, 2000 06:13PM

I'm a dummy, nevermind NM

Grant Houston May 27, 2000 10:20PM

Re: Creede Branch

Doug vV June 02, 2000 11:27PM

Re: Creede Branch

Tim Bain June 03, 2000 01:26AM

Re: Creede Branch

jim May 17, 2000 08:23AM

Re: Creede Branch

little stan June 02, 2000 08:45PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.