Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Creede Branch

May 15, 2000 10:22PM
Wade,
You are right on target. Colorado already is blessed with just about more trains to ride than any other state.
In addition to all the tourist lines let's not forget that it also has two of Amtrak's premire long distance trains passing through.
I think from an emotional standpoint we would all love to see service on the Creede Branch.
From a practical standpoint, I just don't see the income there to justify the expense.
Also, I keep hearing that the line will use the 169, but even if that is so, it can't possibly protect every movement, thus another ng locomotive will be needed.
Most owners of ng locomotives are pretty jealous of them, so where would one come from?
I doubt that even the D&S would part with a 490 to help yet another competing train ride get off the ground.
It's time to start thinking of it as "The South Fork Branch".
Les Jarrett
Subject Author Posted

Creede Branch

Chris Whitmore May 14, 2000 07:23PM

Re: Creede Branch

The Linkman May 15, 2000 09:53AM

Re: Creede Branch

Wade Hall May 15, 2000 07:38PM

Re: Creede Branch

Les Jarrett May 15, 2000 10:22PM

Re: Creede Branch

Bill Malin May 16, 2000 08:07AM

Re: Creede Branch

Dave Boyer May 16, 2000 01:27PM

Re: Creede Branch

Hoss May 16, 2000 08:22PM

Re: Creede Branch

Jim Burrill May 16, 2000 12:28PM

Re: Creede Branch

Don Shank May 22, 2000 03:34PM

Nothing against

Grant Houston May 24, 2000 06:06PM

Re: Nothing against

Don Shank May 25, 2000 10:03AM

Re: Nothing against

Michael Allen May 26, 2000 01:57PM

What about the 169?

Grant Houston May 26, 2000 06:13PM

I'm a dummy, nevermind NM

Grant Houston May 27, 2000 10:20PM

Re: Creede Branch

Doug vV June 02, 2000 11:27PM

Re: Creede Branch

Tim Bain June 03, 2000 01:26AM

Re: Creede Branch

jim May 17, 2000 08:23AM

Re: Creede Branch

little stan June 02, 2000 08:45PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.