Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: D&RGW Form 3250 Denver Sept 16 1960

December 20, 2012 02:44PM
bonefish Wrote:
=======================================================
"To: C&E Eng 481" would be conductor and
> engineer, right?
>
> Just as with Jimmy's posts, it takes a little
> while for me to 'decode' these. Fun stuff, thanks
> for posting William...
>
> Mike McKenzie
> Frankfort IL

Mike that is correct Conductor and Engineer. Also glad to know you are enjoying these train orders--it's fun to post them. Thanks.

William
aka drgwk37
Subject Author Posted

D&RGW Form 3250 Denver Sept 16 1960

drgwk37 December 19, 2012 07:07PM

Re: D&RGW Form 3250 Denver Sept 16 1960

Dirk Ramsey December 19, 2012 09:39PM

Re: D&RGW Form 3250 Denver Sept 16 1960

CharlieMcCandless December 20, 2012 04:31AM

Re: D&RGW Form 3250 Denver Sept 16 1960

Earl December 20, 2012 09:54AM

Re: D&RGW Form 3250 Denver Sept 16 1960

drgwk37 December 20, 2012 02:37PM

Re: D&RGW Form 3250 Denver Sept 16 1960

HogandTow December 20, 2012 03:11PM

Re: D&RGW Form 3250 Denver Sept 16 1960

bonefish December 20, 2012 09:02AM

Re: D&RGW Form 3250 Denver Sept 16 1960

Dirk Ramsey December 20, 2012 09:11AM

Re: D&RGW Form 3250 Denver Sept 16 1960

Jim McKee December 20, 2012 11:43AM

Re: D&RGW Form 3250 Denver Sept 16 1960

drgwk37 December 20, 2012 02:44PM

Re: D&RGW Form 3250 Denver Sept 16 1960

Tomstp December 20, 2012 02:47PM

The funny part

CharlieMcCandless December 20, 2012 03:08PM

Re: The funny part

tpeterman December 21, 2012 07:50AM

Re: The funny part

Jim McKee December 21, 2012 11:28AM

Re: The funny part

CharlieMcCandless December 21, 2012 12:22PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login