Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Boiler replacement on C's

April 27, 2000 04:30PM
I believe the key word here is drafting. Nobody extended smokeboxes like the Union Pacific. Good comparisons can be made against S.P. locomotives that otherwise were very similar. Keep in mind that the SP burned oil and the UP burned high grade black dirt. When burning the latter, there needed to be plenty of smokebox room for the mess that came through the flues and tried to go up the stack. Wheelbarrow loads of cinders and junk were shoveled out of the smokeboxes during regular inspections. Also, I think UP probably experimented with drafting more than any other railroad--witness their Sweeney stacks.
:es Clark
Subject Author Posted

aesthetics of extended smokeboxes

crh April 27, 2000 12:47PM

Re: aesthetics of extended smokeboxes

Don Richter April 27, 2000 01:46PM

Boiler replacement on C's

Herb Kelsey April 27, 2000 03:32PM

Re: Boiler replacement on C's

Les Clark April 27, 2000 04:30PM

Re: Boiler replacement on C's

Earl April 28, 2000 06:11PM

The 346

Don Richter April 29, 2000 09:11AM

Re: Boiler replacement on C's

Dennis O'Berry May 01, 2000 12:56PM

Re: Boiler replacement on C's

Herb Kelsey May 01, 2000 04:54PM

Re: RGS Boilers

Earl May 01, 2000 07:39PM

Re: RGS Boilers

Herb Kelsey May 02, 2000 03:42PM

Re: RGS Boilers

Dennis O'Berry May 03, 2000 10:01AM

It's 10 o'clock, do you know where your stack is?

Kelly Anderson April 27, 2000 07:26PM

Smokeboxes, The Long and Short of It

Kelly Anderson April 27, 2000 07:12PM

464's smokebox

Marty Knox April 27, 2000 07:41PM

Re: 464's smokebox

Steve Zuiderveen May 03, 2000 06:21PM

speaking of the GW

crh April 28, 2000 11:53AM

Re: speaking of the GW

Phil Johnson April 28, 2000 07:49PM

C-21's and other Baldwin Critters

Mike Trent April 30, 2000 07:59PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.