Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Background

July 17, 2010 06:53AM
According to Bob Richardson the D&RGW, I believe in the early 50's, set out on a campaign to prepare the line between Antonito and Chama for conversion to standard gauge.

Many of the trestles were strengthened to allow the heavier weight, but Loboto was not included, and the Cascade trestle was too long and too high for successful conversion. Obviuously the strategy shifted from conversion to abandonment and there was never any further discussion of it.

As these trestles were not built for the ponderous weight of the large K Class locomotives, it was determined that at certain locations, such as Loboto and Cascade, there could be no coupled doubleheading.

It was later noted in the D&RGW's petition for abandonment that the cost of upgrading or replacing these two structures not only for conversion to standard gauge, but also for daily safe operation was prohibitavly high. Some have even speculated that the entire process of considering standard gauging the line was nothing more than a way to lay groundwork to later use as a reason to abandon the line. Which happened.

It would be great to be able to talk to anyone who was working with the railroad during that time for additional background, but the reasons for these rules are well known.
Subject Author Posted

What do you mean, no K class doubles!

pd3463 July 16, 2010 05:31AM

Re: What do you mean, no K class doubles!

Donald Foster July 16, 2010 03:26PM

Re: What do you mean, no K class doubles!

Brian Norden July 16, 2010 08:58PM

Re: What do you mean, no K class doubles!

pd3463 July 17, 2010 05:35AM

Re: What do you mean, no K class doubles!

Donald Foster July 17, 2010 06:16AM

Re: What do you mean, no K class doubles!

guymonmd July 16, 2010 04:40PM

Re: What do you mean, no K class doubles!

pd3463 July 16, 2010 04:53PM

Background

Mike Trent July 17, 2010 06:53AM

Re: What do you mean, no K class doubles!

Jerry Day July 17, 2010 09:30AM

Re: What do you mean, no K class doubles!

CharlieMcCandless July 17, 2010 11:27AM

Re: What do you mean, no K class doubles!

rehunn July 17, 2010 12:15PM

Re: What do you mean, no K class doubles!

Russo Loco July 21, 2010 09:40AM

Re: What do you mean, no K class doubles!

Mike Trent July 17, 2010 02:55PM

Re: What do you mean, no K class doubles! Attachments

Jimmy Blouch July 17, 2010 04:05PM

Re: What do you mean, no K class doubles!

pd3463 July 17, 2010 04:16PM

Re: What do you mean, no K class doubles!

Mike Trent July 17, 2010 06:54PM

Re: What do you mean, no K class doubles!

Jerry Day July 17, 2010 07:08PM

Re: What do you mean, no K class doubles!

Mike Trent July 17, 2010 07:58PM

Re: What do you mean, no K class doubles!

Jerry Day July 20, 2010 11:07AM

Re: What do you mean, no K class doubles!

Donald Foster July 18, 2010 07:19AM

Why the list at all?

hank July 18, 2010 09:52AM

Tradition and trivia

John West July 18, 2010 01:37PM

Re: Tradition and trivia

Dirk Ramsey July 18, 2010 09:43PM

Re: Tradition and trivia

Russo Loco July 21, 2010 03:27PM

Re: Tradition and trivia

Earl July 21, 2010 03:57PM

Re: What do you mean, no K class doubles!

SoCalCond July 21, 2010 05:06PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login