Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Case Boiler Explosion

Mik
September 03, 2001 09:09PM
You are right on 2 counts, First, no, I'm not a Payton fan, Many of the reasons have been pretty well explained by others... and second, yes the hobby grapevine IS tremendous.
I still can't help but question the motives of whoever, shall we say "prematurely", released the report. And I rather doubt the Medina sherriff, and some of the other agencies involved are real happy about it either. Yes, this almost the norm these days, but IMHO it still isn't very ethical.
As for the question of "would I be 'upset' if the report is accurate?" Concerned would be a better word... Concerned that the rest of the steam community will get broad brush painted as "dangerous kooks" by someone with an axe to grind, or political hay to make. (No one that I know would consider firing a questionable boiler.) Concerned that there will be a lot of new, perhaps draconian legislation to prevent recurrance of what is actually a rather isolated incident. (As I said before, I, and most hobbyists, welcome an inspection program that is an "honest appraisal" of the boiler's condition. I simply don't care for legal hoops that do nothing much to accomplish that end, but were put there just to make some politico feel that he "accomplished" something.)
I am also a bit concerned that by leaking the report, someone may have compromised the official investigation, which could perhaps lead to a Clintonian legal circus.
Subject Author Posted

Case Boiler Explosion

Smitty August 31, 2001 08:49AM

Re: Case Boiler Explosion

Jim Adams August 31, 2001 11:05AM

Re: Case Boiler Explosion

Smitty August 31, 2001 11:45AM

Tri-cocks, Tri-cocks, Tri-cocks!

Herb Kelsey August 31, 2001 12:29PM

Re: Tri-cocks, Tri-cocks, Tri-cocks!

Casey Carlson August 31, 2001 01:28PM

Re: Tri-cocks, Tri-cocks, Tri-cocks!

Mik August 31, 2001 01:44PM

Re: Tri-cocks, Tri-cocks, Tri-cocks!

Jim Adams August 31, 2001 02:18PM

Re: Tri-cocks, Tri-cocks, Tri-cocks! - NOT!!

Earl Pitts August 31, 2001 03:00PM

Re: Tri-cocks, Tri-cocks, Tri-cocks! - NOT!!

Hrm O'Biph August 31, 2001 03:22PM

Re: Tri-cocks, Tri-cocks, Tri-cocks! - NOT!!

Earl Pitts August 31, 2001 04:23PM

Re: Tri-cocks, Tri-cocks, Tri-cocks! - NOT!!

Fred T August 31, 2001 07:14PM

Re: Tri-cocks, Tri-cocks, Tri-cocks! - NOT!!

Hrm O'Biph August 31, 2001 07:23PM

2nd glass

Mik August 31, 2001 07:49PM

Re: 2nd glass

Hrm O'Biph August 31, 2001 09:33PM

Re: 2nd glass

Mik August 31, 2001 11:41PM

Re: Tri-cocks, Tri-cocks, Tri-cocks! - NOT!!

RBrinton August 31, 2001 07:58PM

Re: Tri-cocks, Tri-cocks, Tri-cocks! - NOT!!

Mik August 31, 2001 08:33PM

Re: Tri-cocks, Tri-cocks, Tri-cocks! - NOT!!

Jim Adams August 31, 2001 10:12PM

Re: Tri-cocks, Tri-cocks, Tri-cocks! - NOT!!

dan September 01, 2001 09:06AM

Re: Tri-cocks, Tri-cocks, Tri-cocks! - NOT!!

Earl Pitts September 01, 2001 09:55AM

Re: Tri-cocks, Tri-cocks, Tri-cocks! - NOT!!

Casey Carlson September 01, 2001 11:32AM

Re: Tri-cocks, Tri-cocks, Tri-cocks! - NOT!!

Jim Adams September 01, 2001 12:09PM

Re: Case Boiler Explosion

Bob Keller August 31, 2001 11:08AM

Re: Case Boiler Explosion

Hrm O'Biph August 31, 2001 11:33AM

Re: Case Boiler Explosion

Mik August 31, 2001 12:00PM

Re: Case Boiler Explosion

Rob Gram September 01, 2001 09:35AM

Re: Case Boiler Explosion

Michael Allen September 03, 2001 10:39AM

Re: Case Boiler Explosion

Mik September 03, 2001 09:09PM

Re: Case Boiler Explosion: an outside observer

Marshall Jose September 04, 2001 02:08PM

Re: Case Boiler Explosion: an outside observer

Mik September 04, 2001 08:03PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.