Scott Turner Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> We've been over this recently, but perhaps it was
> during your hiatus, Roger.
>
> These discussions always polarize, as though there
> were only two alternatives - in this case, safety
> or historic integrity - with an assumption that
> you can't have one if you have the other.
>
> The reality is that in most cases, it isn't
> either/or. You really CAN have your cake and eat
> it too, with some care and thought.
>
> We all pretty much agreed, in the aforementioned
> discussion, that the lights are a necessary
> element for the safety of the current operation,
> but that doesn't mean that the lighting couldn't
> have been executed in less modern and obtrusive
> ways.
Hi Scott, because of the prior discussion I was asked to take and post these photos.