Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

number of locos.

DvV
June 24, 2001 12:28PM
It sounds like 4 locos for the current schedule is a ballancing act (I guess last season's three locos at start up was worse).
Kyle had 6 locos (thanks to J. Bush, Earl, Coker and company) for a few years.
For the current operating schedule:
1) are five servicable/operable locos reasonable?
2) can 5 handle charters or chould a sixth loco be available?
3) would a seventh or eighth loco (i.e. 483 and/or 492) help?
4) would the same seventh or eighth loco make the routine maintenence more difficult (i.e. too many for the shop crew to turn around without increasing shop crew size)?
On a slightly different line, Has the "Train to Cumbres and bus back trips" hurt the Osier round trip loadings or has it actually helped the bottom line?
Thanks
Doug
Subject Author Posted

484 and 488

Kevin Cook June 22, 2001 04:02PM

Re: 484 and 488

John West June 22, 2001 04:28PM

Re: 484 and 488

Mike "Carburetor" Oestreich June 22, 2001 08:59PM

Re: 484 and 488

R.E. Hess June 22, 2001 09:47PM

New boiler regs

John West June 22, 2001 10:08PM

Re: 484 and 488

jaybawb June 24, 2001 07:32AM

number of locos.

DvV June 24, 2001 12:28PM

Re: number of locos. *PIC*

jaybawb June 24, 2001 06:08PM

Re: number of locos.

Fred T June 24, 2001 09:24PM

Re: number of locos.

jaybawb June 25, 2001 07:23AM

Re: number of locos.

Boris Serena June 25, 2001 10:21AM

Charter and other

DvV June 25, 2001 07:56PM

Re: Charter and other

jaybawb June 25, 2001 10:56PM

Baa, baa *NM*

Fred T June 25, 2001 11:08PM

Re: Baa, baa, Moo, moo *NM*

jaybawb June 25, 2001 11:26PM

Re: Charter and other

DvV June 26, 2001 03:09PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.