Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: A third rail in Antonito

February 13, 2008 07:39PM avatar
Do-able(?) Daydreams:

FRA considerations aside, IMHO IF there is going to be a San Juan mixed from Alamosa to arrive in time for its passengers to board the C&TS to Chama, it would save a lot of time & hassle if they could simply walk from the San Juan on the south side of the old depot to a C&TS extension on the north side of the old depot rather than having to board a bus (or two) at the old depot, unload from the bus(es) at the new depot and then board the C&TS.

There is no operational need for a third rail on all legs of the wye, as the C&TS trains could simply back down to the old depot around 9:00 am, load at about 9:10, move to the new depot at 9:25, load at the new depot at 9:40, and depart for Chama as usual at 10:00 am. In the evening, the eastbound C&TS could unload at the new depot before continuing on to connect with the San Juan at the old depot, and then run backwards to the current facilities.

The absolute minimum expense - avoiding even one three-rail switch at the northwest corner (and preserving "insularity"?) - would be to lay the narrow gauge parallel to the northwest side of the wye. Of course from a historical perspective, it would be great to add a third rail to the entire wye (which would have to include a 'draw' or 'swish') for an occasional demonstration.

- El Curmudgeono Viejo y Loco
Subject Author Posted

A third rail to Alamosa.

Jim February 10, 2008 03:00PM

Re: A third rail to Alamosa.

CharlieMcCandless February 10, 2008 04:06PM

Re: A third rail to Alamosa.

Ed Stabler February 10, 2008 04:23PM

Re: A third rail to Alamosa.

Keith February 10, 2008 06:46PM

Re: A third rail to Alamosa.

george pearce February 10, 2008 07:38PM

Re: A third rail to Alamosa.

Chile John February 11, 2008 09:17AM

Re: A third rail to Alamosa.

HOD Bill February 11, 2008 03:16PM

Re: A third rail to Alamosa.

Chile John February 11, 2008 06:10PM

Federal Jurisdiction over interstate commerce.

Dan Markoff February 11, 2008 07:39PM

Re: Federal Jurisdiction over interstate commerce.

John West February 11, 2008 10:50PM

Toilet Paper and Federal Jurisdiction

Dan Markoff February 12, 2008 07:11AM

Re: Federal Jurisdiction over interstate commerce.

michael February 14, 2008 01:03PM

Re: A third rail to Alamosa.

Roger Mitchell February 12, 2008 12:57PM

Re: A third rail to Alamosa.

Eric Bolton February 12, 2008 06:35PM

Re: A third rail to Alamosa.

szuiderveen February 13, 2008 07:27PM

Re: FRA definition of insular

Ed Ellis February 14, 2008 07:02PM

Re: FRA definition of insular

HOD Bill February 14, 2008 07:55PM

Re: A third rail to Alamosa.

Greg Raven February 11, 2008 06:29PM

Re: A third rail to Alamosa.

dougvv February 11, 2008 07:41PM

Re: A third rail to Alamosa. Attachments

Ed Ellis February 11, 2008 08:14PM

Re: A third rail to Alamosa.

Earl February 13, 2008 08:56PM

Re: A third rail to Alamosa.

Keith February 11, 2008 09:33AM

Re: A third rail to Alamosa.

Dave Boyer February 11, 2008 10:46AM

Re: A third rail to Alamosa.

Keith February 11, 2008 07:38PM

Re: A third rail to Alamosa.

CharlieMcCandless February 11, 2008 07:51PM

Re: A third rail in Antonito

Russo Loco February 13, 2008 07:39PM

Re: A third rail to Alamosa.

stuart olson February 11, 2008 09:38PM

Re: A third rail to Alamosa.

dougvv February 11, 2008 10:46PM

Photoshop pic

timtrain488 February 12, 2008 07:14AM

Re: Photoshop pic

Ed Stabler February 12, 2008 08:16AM

Re: Photoshop pic

Keith February 12, 2008 09:12AM

Re: Photoshop pic

Ed Stabler February 12, 2008 12:21PM

Re: Photoshop pic - use #497 ... grinning smiley

Russo Loco February 13, 2008 07:48PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login