Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Toilet Paper and Federal Jurisdiction

February 12, 2008 07:11AM
If you look at the history of the growth of the federal government it has never shrunk. It has a habit of always expanding, always encompassing, costing more, and on and on.

Your question is very good in that it asks what is out there that the FRA can regulate but have not. Unfortunately, I think that it is anything they want to. That is because of two things: First, no one really pays much attention to what the requirements of the constitution are and if they do, no one holds the government accountable. Government intrusiveness has become like algae. If not held in check it will invade wherever it can. The other thing is that even when the constitution is given lip service, the "interpretation" is so expansive that instead of being a limitation on government it is a license to to whatever it wants. The Commerce Clause of Article 1 section 8 which I mentioned earler is a great example. Instead of regulating commerce between states, it has been interpreted to be anything that "affects" interstate commerce. So, even though something like toilet paper would seem to be a particularly individual and localized use commodity, the fact that everyone uses it has a substantial impact on interestate commerce, and therefore subject to federal regulation.

I have practiced law for some 35 years. Half of that time was exclusively in the federal courts, up to the Supreme Court of the United States. If there is one thing I learned in all that time, it is that the Constitution is honored more in its breach than its observance. That is an unfortunate observation, but true. If there is any doubt just ask when was the last time the United States actually declared war like the Constitution requires? That is one of the most important and fundamental functions of government where the lives and treasure of our country are committed to a cause. While you're thinking about it, regardless of the merits of being there, how many of our brave soldiers have probably died today in the Iraq "war" and how much has it cost? So, what is a little detail like the Commerce clause to limit FRA jurisdiction. They will do whatever they want unless there is somebody out there to slow them down. Considering everything else, what are the chances of that?

Dan Markoff
Subject Author Posted

A third rail to Alamosa.

Jim February 10, 2008 03:00PM

Re: A third rail to Alamosa.

CharlieMcCandless February 10, 2008 04:06PM

Re: A third rail to Alamosa.

Ed Stabler February 10, 2008 04:23PM

Re: A third rail to Alamosa.

Keith February 10, 2008 06:46PM

Re: A third rail to Alamosa.

george pearce February 10, 2008 07:38PM

Re: A third rail to Alamosa.

Chile John February 11, 2008 09:17AM

Re: A third rail to Alamosa.

HOD Bill February 11, 2008 03:16PM

Re: A third rail to Alamosa.

Chile John February 11, 2008 06:10PM

Federal Jurisdiction over interstate commerce.

Dan Markoff February 11, 2008 07:39PM

Re: Federal Jurisdiction over interstate commerce.

John West February 11, 2008 10:50PM

Toilet Paper and Federal Jurisdiction

Dan Markoff February 12, 2008 07:11AM

Re: Federal Jurisdiction over interstate commerce.

michael February 14, 2008 01:03PM

Re: A third rail to Alamosa.

Roger Mitchell February 12, 2008 12:57PM

Re: A third rail to Alamosa.

Eric Bolton February 12, 2008 06:35PM

Re: A third rail to Alamosa.

szuiderveen February 13, 2008 07:27PM

Re: FRA definition of insular

Ed Ellis February 14, 2008 07:02PM

Re: FRA definition of insular

HOD Bill February 14, 2008 07:55PM

Re: A third rail to Alamosa.

Greg Raven February 11, 2008 06:29PM

Re: A third rail to Alamosa.

dougvv February 11, 2008 07:41PM

Re: A third rail to Alamosa. Attachments

Ed Ellis February 11, 2008 08:14PM

Re: A third rail to Alamosa.

Earl February 13, 2008 08:56PM

Re: A third rail to Alamosa.

Keith February 11, 2008 09:33AM

Re: A third rail to Alamosa.

Dave Boyer February 11, 2008 10:46AM

Re: A third rail to Alamosa.

Keith February 11, 2008 07:38PM

Re: A third rail to Alamosa.

CharlieMcCandless February 11, 2008 07:51PM

Re: A third rail in Antonito

Russo Loco February 13, 2008 07:39PM

Re: A third rail to Alamosa.

stuart olson February 11, 2008 09:38PM

Re: A third rail to Alamosa.

dougvv February 11, 2008 10:46PM

Photoshop pic

timtrain488 February 12, 2008 07:14AM

Re: Photoshop pic

Ed Stabler February 12, 2008 08:16AM

Re: Photoshop pic

Keith February 12, 2008 09:12AM

Re: Photoshop pic

Ed Stabler February 12, 2008 12:21PM

Re: Photoshop pic - use #497 ... grinning smiley

Russo Loco February 13, 2008 07:48PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login