Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Locomotive Preservation

June 11, 2001 01:01PM
Just to add one more thing to the fire here...the locos at Promontory....yes when they were built, they were completely historically accurate, right down to being wood burners....later, they were both converted to oil buring with wood carried for looks...This was from a vist there several years ago...They still 'look' accurate, but are very modern.
Also, didn't the Mt Washington Cog Railroad have new locos built about the same time that were built to the original specs but with all new construction techniques.
I have to agree with Steve, I would much rather see some of the other locos rebuilt than just sitting there.
For example, I know I brought this up last year, 483 is dead, but what of 492, 495 and the other K-37 (I forget the number). 492 is in the Chama yard and has always been there since 1976 when I first went up. It just seems to be moved from place to place in the yard. And the others are at Antonito...Are there plans for them or are they just there for looks until they rust away....
As for the flood lights...I am in favor of security over historical accuracy. If I recall, don't those locos sit out at nite, under steam waiting for the next days run....I would sure hate for some jerk to turn off the water or do some other damage that could cause a catastrophic situation. That brings me to another question...C&TS does have insurance in case something happens doesn't it?
Subject Author Posted

Locomotive Preservation

Doug Jones June 11, 2001 10:33AM

Re: Locomotive Preservation

Steve Peck June 11, 2001 11:16AM

Re: Locomotive Preservation

freddyb June 11, 2001 01:01PM

Re: Locomotive Preservation

Kevin June 11, 2001 01:32PM

Re: Locomotive Preservation

Kevin June 11, 2001 01:51PM

Re: Locomotive Preservation

Fred T June 11, 2001 01:57PM

Re: Locomotive Preservation

Fred June 11, 2001 02:34PM

Promontory Locos

David Dewey June 11, 2001 02:21PM

You are right/I am wrong

freddyb June 11, 2001 04:02PM

Well, I'm allowed one right answer per year!

David Dewey June 11, 2001 09:56PM

Re: Locomotive Preservation

Mike Stillwell June 11, 2001 06:58PM

Re: Locomotive Preservation

Fred T June 11, 2001 09:24PM

483

Kevin Cook June 12, 2001 09:21AM

Re: 483

freddyb June 12, 2001 10:07AM

Re: 483

Fred T June 12, 2001 10:30AM

Re: 483

Mark Stoeckel June 12, 2001 03:01PM

More info on 483 fund

Mark Stoeckel June 12, 2001 03:19PM

Info on 483 fund

RichB June 12, 2001 04:39PM

Re: Info on 483 fund

Jay Wimer June 13, 2001 12:38PM

Re: Info on 483 fund

Mark Stoeckel June 13, 2001 02:58PM

Re: Info on 483 fund

jay June 13, 2001 04:37PM

Thanks Jay.

RichB June 13, 2001 04:33PM

Re: 483

jaybawb June 13, 2001 12:32PM

Re: 483

freddyb June 13, 2001 12:57PM

Re: 483

jaybawb June 13, 2001 01:18PM

Re: 483

freddyb June 13, 2001 01:59PM

Re: 483

Scott Hightower (Skawt) June 13, 2001 03:31PM

Re: 483 asbestos removal

Fred T June 14, 2001 10:51AM

Re: 483 asbestos removal

Mark Stoeckel June 14, 2001 12:41PM

Re: 483 asbestos removal

Jay June 14, 2001 11:42PM

Re: Locomotive Preservation

Mik June 11, 2001 02:41PM

Chinese?

Steve Peck June 11, 2001 09:35PM

Boiler on Heisler#2

Tom Shreve June 12, 2001 09:48AM

Re: Boiler on Heisler#2

Steve Peck June 12, 2001 02:48PM

Re: Locomotive Preservation

Don Richter June 11, 2001 02:48PM

History

DvV June 12, 2001 09:22PM

Re: History

Don Richter June 13, 2001 09:50AM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.