Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Yes, The CAT'S ran for 17 yrs...

PRR
April 09, 2001 09:34PM
I object to the distorted photo art instead of photographic image records. The first photo could have passed for the recent Norfolk Southern annual report, if it wasn't for a steam tender. We don't need fisheye lenses in TRAINS, the most respected conservative railroad magazine. #497 through the window is good and the next five are good photographs also, but is that it? They forgot the loop at Osier on the "new" map.
Subject Author Posted

Some thoughts on the TRAINS article

Brian Shoup April 08, 2001 09:00PM

Re: Some thoughts on the TRAINS article

ICMountainLover April 08, 2001 10:10PM

Re: Some thoughts on the TRAINS article

Chile John April 09, 2001 08:19AM

Re: Yes, The CAT'S ran for 17 yrs...

Craig Kumler April 09, 2001 12:14PM

Re: Yes, The CAT'S ran for 17 yrs...

Bill Calmes April 09, 2001 12:56PM

So....., aside from all that, what did you guys...

Brian Shoup April 09, 2001 01:18PM

Re: So....., aside from all that, what did you guy

Craig Kumler April 09, 2001 05:14PM

Re: Yes, The CAT'S ran for 17 yrs...

Jay April 09, 2001 07:54PM

Re: Yes, The CAT'S ran for 17 yrs...

PRR April 09, 2001 09:34PM

In fairness to CJ

John West April 09, 2001 11:07PM

Re: In fairness to CJ

jay April 10, 2001 05:45AM

Re: To all the cynics

Wade Hall April 10, 2001 10:24AM

Re: A cynic NOT

Jay April 10, 2001 11:12AM

Re: cynics

Mik April 10, 2001 11:14AM

Re: cynics

John Fisher April 10, 2001 03:05PM

Re: cynics

Jay April 10, 2001 09:46PM

Re: To all the cynics

Chile John April 10, 2001 01:44PM

Re: To all the cynics

jay April 10, 2001 02:47PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.