Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Another approach

September 08, 2007 03:37PM avatar
I have been thinking about your post Chris.

Throw them out for none performance

I for some reason or another think that that is a good idea but not necessarily the contractor since I have no idea what his contract says and maybe he is in compliance.

My suggestion would be BELL and a couple of others should be thrown out for NO performance. Maybe a better way of saying it "for none performance".

All of the reading I have done over the years it always keeps coming back to BELL IMHO.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/08/2007 04:11PM by Roger Hogan.
Subject Author Posted

Georgetown Loop Lease Option

MarkG September 07, 2007 06:20PM

Re: Georgetown Loop Lease Option

Roger Hogan September 07, 2007 06:48PM

Re: Georgetown Loop Lease Option

MarkG September 07, 2007 08:47PM

Re: Georgetown Loop Lease Option

michael September 07, 2007 10:18PM

Re: Georgetown Loop Lease Option

Chris Webster September 08, 2007 11:57AM

Re: Georgetown Loop Lease Option

Roger Hogan September 08, 2007 12:26PM

Another approach

Roger Hogan September 08, 2007 03:37PM

Re: Georgetown Loop Lease Option

Robert Herronen September 08, 2007 05:32PM

Re: Georgetown Loop Lease Option

locoboilerguy September 09, 2007 09:35AM

Re: Georgetown Loop Lease Option

KAM September 09, 2007 11:38AM

A Possible Explanation: Being the Devil's Advocate

Steve Stockham September 09, 2007 08:03PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login