Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Narrow Gauge Truck Size

August 05, 2007 09:09AM avatar
The 3'7" wb truck was used because at the time they were built outside-hung brake beams were pretty much standard. With outside-hung brakes you didn't need a longer wheelbase to work, so they were less expensive to build. However, the short reefers had 4'8" trucks and they were equipped with inside-hung brake beams. Why you ask? Because the reefer would drip salty water from the ice bunkers all over the brake beams on outside-hung trucks and rot them in a heartbeat. So if that's the case, why not use the inside-hung 4'8" wb truck on all of the cars? Simple...it's much easier to replace brake shoes on an outside-hung truck. Remember, this is Colorado... and it's miserable out there in the winter.

As for capacity, that is determined by the journal size and NOT the truck design. Yes, the short reefers were only rated at 20 tons (most of the rest of the fleet was rated at 25 tons) but remember, the ice capacity was NOT included in the tare weight of the reefer, which accounts for the "missing" 5 tons.
Subject Author Posted

Narrow Gauge Truck Size

Kevin S. August 04, 2007 02:32PM

Re: Narrow Gauge Truck Size

The Josh August 05, 2007 12:45AM

Re: Narrow Gauge Truck Size

BillD August 05, 2007 09:09AM

Re: Narrow Gauge Truck Size

Ron Keagle August 05, 2007 09:41AM

Re: Narrow Gauge Truck Size

Rick Steele August 05, 2007 10:31AM

Re: Narrow Gauge Truck Size

Ron Keagle August 06, 2007 12:09PM

Re: Narrow Gauge Truck Size

davegrandt August 06, 2007 03:01PM

Re: Narrow Gauge Truck Size

BillD August 06, 2007 06:34PM

Re: Narrow Gauge Truck Size

Randy Hees August 07, 2007 11:54AM

Re: Narrow Gauge Truck Size

Brian Norden August 08, 2007 09:08PM

Re: Narrow Gauge Truck Size

davegrandt August 09, 2007 08:21AM

Re: Narrow Gauge Truck Size

Paul Dalleska August 09, 2007 02:35PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login