Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: More K-28 Thoughts

Wade Hall
May 17, 2007 01:58PM
After the discontinuance of the Chili Line and the Shavano, 3 K-28's were sufficient to protect service on the San Juan. The Silverton Branch was not yet hauling tourists and there were K-27's available for the mixed train there. Unlike the K-28's, the K-27's could pull double duty--on the Silverton Branch and on lease to the Rio Grande Southern. The K-28's were too heavy for the RGS trackage.
Also, 474 was not usually assigned to passenger service--it was generally used on the Crested Butte Branch. If you note in the photo posted elsehwere, it had a yard pilot--handy for switching use in Crested Butte. I was told it did not have a steam line running through its tender, so it could not be used for winter passenger service.
One also has to remember that, during WW II, the drilling boom had not started in the San Juan Basin. Traffic on the San Juan Extension was not that heavy. Most of the K-37's were assigned to Salida for use over Marshall Pass and on the Monarch Branch, both of which were busy during the war years. The K-37's were swapped for a number of K-36's for Marshall and Monarch service not long before the Valley Line was abandoned. It is interesting to note that of all of the active K-36's today, all except 484 and 488 spent a fair chunk of the 1950's working out of Salida. (487 was also in Salida, but was a relatively early "returnee" to Alamosa.)485 was scrapped in Salida, after it "slept-walked" into the Salida turntable pit. Many of its parts were used to rebuild 489, the last locomotive overhauled in Salida.
K-27's, 28's, 36's, and 37's--I love 'em all.
Subject Author Posted

More K-28 Thoughts

Bill Daniels May 17, 2007 08:02AM

Re: More K-28 Thoughts

stuart olson May 17, 2007 10:24AM

Re: More K-28 Thoughts

ETSRRCo May 17, 2007 11:32AM

Re: More K-28 Thoughts

Wade Hall May 17, 2007 01:58PM

The "K"

Tim May 17, 2007 02:41PM

Re: More K-28 Thoughts

Jerry Day May 21, 2007 05:13PM

Re: More K-28 Thoughts

Mike Trent May 17, 2007 02:33PM

Re: More K-28 Thoughts

William Reed May 17, 2007 02:56PM

Re: More K-28 Thoughts

Wade Hall May 17, 2007 04:58PM

Re: More K-28 Thoughts

Greg Scholl May 17, 2007 06:02PM

Re: More K-28 Thoughts

Bill Daniels May 17, 2007 08:39PM

They were drafted

Charlie McCandless May 17, 2007 09:11PM

Re: More K-28 Thoughts

Mike Trent May 17, 2007 10:04PM

Re: More K-28 Thoughts

Mike Trent May 17, 2007 10:36PM

Re: More K-28 Thoughts

Wade Hall May 18, 2007 12:09PM

Re: More K-28 Thoughts

Greg Scholl May 18, 2007 02:45PM

Re: More K-28 Thoughts

Casey Akin May 18, 2007 03:55PM

Re: More K-28 Thoughts

Greg Scholl May 19, 2007 06:46AM

Re: More K-28 Thoughts

Herb Kelsey May 22, 2007 10:47AM

Re: More K-28 Thoughts

Greg Scholl May 22, 2007 12:02PM

How about lease trades?

Charlie McCandless May 22, 2007 03:57PM

Re: How about lease trades?

Greg Scholl May 22, 2007 04:00PM

Re: How about the San Juan?

Rod Jensen May 22, 2007 04:46PM

463 overhaul?

ETSRRCo May 22, 2007 07:08PM

Re: 463 overhaul? *LINK* *PIC*

Rod Jensen May 22, 2007 08:51PM

Re: 463 overhaul?

Greg Scholl May 23, 2007 07:19AM

Re: 463 overhaul?

El Coke May 23, 2007 06:55AM

Re: How about lease trades?

Ed Stabler May 22, 2007 04:46PM

Re: How about lease trades?

Jerry Day May 23, 2007 11:49AM

Re: More K-28 Thoughts

Herb Kelsey May 22, 2007 07:57PM

Re: More K-28 Thoughts

Keith Hayes May 21, 2007 07:14PM

Re: More K-28 Thoughts

Mike Trent May 22, 2007 08:32PM

Re: More K-28 Thoughts

John Templeton (Chama Station Agent) May 23, 2007 08:02AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login