Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Published Report: No Steam at Loop in 2007

May 06, 2007 10:29PM
Dan posted: At this time, my opinion is that any claim the Loop will not operate steam at all this year is unfounded rumor that serves no purpose other to incite fear and criticism for someone's undetermined purpose.
This "unfounded rumor" is something that was actually published in the Colorado Timetable, or so I am told -- I am not a subscriber, nor have I seen that issue.
Opening day is May 26, two weeks and five days from now. Anyone know where #12's drivers are?
As for inciting "fear and criticism for someone's undetermined purpose", please keep in mind that a visit to Colorado is a once-in-a-lifetime trip for many railfans and modelers. After the recent issue of "Trains" profiled #9, how many railfans are planning their once-in-a-lifetime trip for this summer, expecting to be able ride behind her?
--
Chris Webster
[www.speakeasy.org]
Subject Author Posted

Published Report: No Steam at Loop in 2007 *LINK*

Chris Webster May 05, 2007 11:23PM

Re: No Steam Loop in 2007 *PIC*

Dave S. May 06, 2007 10:31AM

Re: No Steam Loop in 2007

earl May 06, 2007 10:50AM

That looks like it is waiting for a strong wind...

George Gaskill May 10, 2007 12:26PM

C&S#9 in 2006

Steve Stockham May 06, 2007 11:49AM

Re: C&S#9 in 2006 *PIC*

Dick Bell May 06, 2007 01:43PM

Re: C&S#9 in 2006

Dick Bell May 06, 2007 02:00PM

Re: C&S#9 in 2006 *NM* *PIC*

Dick Bell May 06, 2007 02:01PM

Re: C&S#9 in 2006 *NM* *PIC*

Dick Bell May 06, 2007 02:02PM

Re: C&S#9 in 2006 *NM* *PIC*

Dick Bell May 06, 2007 02:02PM

Re: C&S#9 in 2006 *NM* *PIC*

Dick Bell May 06, 2007 02:04PM

Wow, thanks!

Mark Valerius May 08, 2007 08:17AM

Re: C&S#9 in 2006 *LINK*

Glen Brewer May 06, 2007 01:55PM

Re: C&S#9 in 2006

Steve Stockham May 06, 2007 03:03PM

Re: Published Report: No Steam at Loop in 2007

Dan Robirds May 06, 2007 12:08PM

Beware of anonymity!

Robert May 06, 2007 12:35PM

Re: Published Report: No Steam at Loop in 2007

Taylor Rush May 06, 2007 12:54PM

Re: Published Report: No Steam at Loop in 2007 *LINK*

Michael Allen May 06, 2007 07:08PM

Re: Published Report: No Steam at Loop in 2007

Chris Webster May 06, 2007 10:29PM

Re: Published Report: No Steam at Loop in 2007

M May 07, 2007 06:36PM

Wasted Energy -

Richard Boulware May 07, 2007 07:45PM

Re: Published Report: No Steam at Loop in 2007

M May 07, 2007 02:46PM

(Message Deleted by Poster)

Darth Tater-head May 07, 2007 03:35PM

Re: Better it not run at all...

Steve Stockham May 07, 2007 05:56PM

Re: Better it not run at all...

Sammy D May 07, 2007 06:06PM

Re: Better it not run at all...

Darren West May 08, 2007 07:27AM

Re: Better it not run at all...

dand May 09, 2007 08:04AM

Re: Published Report: No Steam at Loop in 2007

Kwilcomb May 07, 2007 06:59PM

Re: Published Report: No Steam at Loop in 2007

Skip Luke May 09, 2007 10:17PM

Re: Published Report: No Steam at Loop in 2007 *LINK*

Chris Webster May 10, 2007 03:55PM

Re: Published Report: No Steam at Loop in 2007

Darren May 10, 2007 05:51PM

1204 Re: Published Report: No Steam at Loop *LINK*

Chris Webster May 10, 2007 09:13PM

Re: 1203

Dan Robirds May 10, 2007 11:03PM

Re: 1203 *PIC*

Jerry Huck May 10, 2007 11:44PM

Re: 1203 *PIC*

Jerry Huck May 10, 2007 11:46PM

Re: 1203 Re: Published Report: No Steam at Loop

Darren May 11, 2007 06:23AM

Re: Published Report: No Steam at Loop in 2007

Skip Luke May 10, 2007 08:39PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login