Steve, so, indeed the post was yours. I don't intend in any way to start the flaming again. It's unproductive.
Your post took aim at the issue of objectivity in Ms. Murphy's inquiry. Then, you make a comment that shows an entire lack of objectivity or your part.
Long season or not, it was uncalled for.
If she has questions, she's entitled to ask them and get answers. And, her stipulation that the responses come from those NOT associated with ANY of the parties involved seems objective enough.
Critical inquiry and objective analysis is often the catalyst for progress.