Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Weber Patent Rail Joint

July 18, 2006 10:46PM
Patent #402,371, Fig. 4 shows the more massive, outer member of the fish plate as carrying the wheel load as you mention. Is the part that carries the wheel load made of a compressible material like rubber? If so, it would appear that the downward wheel load would cause the rubber material to bulge out horizontally. Since that horizontal pressure would be contained between the rail and that fixed outer flange connected to the base plate, bulging would exert a squeeze on the rail.
So, as the wheel loads the joint, it also strengthens it. What a bizarre idea. The problem is that to allow the wheel load to add side compression, you need a compliant joint which lacks strength when a wheel is not loading it. It seems to make more sense to just make the joint rigid so the wheel does not have to strengthen it.
Does the patent reference say what that material is that is lifing the wheel?
RK
Subject Author Posted

Weber Patent Rail Joint

John Liebson July 18, 2006 04:30PM

Re: Weber Patent Rail Joint *LINK* *PIC*

Nathan Holmes July 18, 2006 05:39PM

Re: Weber Patent Rail Joint *LINK* *PIC*

Nathan Holmes July 18, 2006 05:54PM

And the original *LINK* *PIC*

Nathan Holmes July 18, 2006 05:57PM

Re: Weber Patent Rail Joint *LINK* *PIC*

Nathan Holmes July 18, 2006 05:58PM

Re: Weber Patent Rail Joint

John Liebson July 19, 2006 02:27AM

Re: Weber Patent Rail Joint

RGSW July 18, 2006 08:23PM

Re: Weber Patent Rail Joint

Nathan Holmes July 18, 2006 09:57PM

Re: Weber Patent Rail Joint

Ron Keagle July 18, 2006 10:46PM

Re: Weber Patent Rail Joint

David E. Lamson July 19, 2006 03:27PM

Re: Weber Patent Rail Joint

Philip H. Walters July 19, 2006 11:24PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.