Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Short Memories and relativity

March 03, 2006 08:28PM
I realize that the people making the biggest fuss in Durango are probably new commers maybe from areas where coal smoke is unknown. But at the same time those of us that have grown up in areas where coal was used to heat buildings and homes, would probably see the relativity of the amount of smoke produced by the rr. When we visited our many Colorado aunts, uncles and cousins when I was a kid in the 60's some of my relatives still did not have electricity and were both heating and cooking with coal. Imagine what it was like when nearly everybody used coal in Durango for heating and cooking! The town here in N.E. Ore. where I live and grew up used to fill with inversions of coal smoke as nearly every business building was stoked up about the time I was walking to school. My dads store burned coal and that was one of my tasks as a kid to tend the stoker and haul out the clinkers. Coal smoke was a given and most people didn't seem to mind that I can recall. I have not been to Durango since 1968, but I believe my observation is valid that the @#$%& are complaining about air quality that is vastly improved today from what it was like in many cities only 30 years ago. Frankly I miss the smell of coal smoke!!
Subject Author Posted

A CLEAN CHOO-CHOO

Ron Keagle February 26, 2006 09:31AM

bring a cold engine up to steam much faster

Douglas vV February 26, 2006 09:41AM

Re: bring a cold engine up to steam much faster

Bruce R. Pier February 26, 2006 10:27AM

Re: bring a cold engine up to steam much faster

Ron Keagle February 26, 2006 11:20AM

Re: bring a cold engine up to steam much faster

Douglas vV February 26, 2006 11:36AM

Re: bring a cold engine up to steam much faster

earl February 26, 2006 12:02PM

Re: bring a cold engine up to steam much faster

Ron Keagle February 26, 2006 12:15PM

Re: bring a cold engine up to steam much faster

John Cole February 26, 2006 06:23PM

Even Old Sol is guilty!

Bill February 26, 2006 07:20PM

Re: bring a cold engine up to steam much faster *LINK*

Hugh Odom February 27, 2006 04:29AM

HISTORICAL MISSION

Ron Keagle February 28, 2006 01:26PM

Re: HISTORICAL MISSION *LINK*

Hugh Odom February 28, 2006 06:14PM

SMOKE

Ron Keagle March 02, 2006 10:21AM

Re: SMOKE

G. W. Laepple March 02, 2006 12:40PM

Re: SMOKE

Dittmer March 02, 2006 05:28PM

Re: bring a cold engine up to steam much faster

Kelly Anderson March 03, 2006 06:07AM

Re: bring a cold engine up to steam much faster

John Craft March 03, 2006 08:16AM

Re: bring a cold engine up to steam much faster

Kelly Anderson March 03, 2006 08:54AM

Re: ... smoke ...

El Curmudgeonito March 07, 2006 12:11AM

Re: bring a cold engine up to steam much faster

Douglas vV March 03, 2006 08:40AM

Re: bring a cold engine up to steam much faster

Hugh Odom March 03, 2006 06:59PM

Re: bring a cold engine up to steam much faster *LINK*

Hugh Odom March 03, 2006 07:02PM

Re: bring a cold engine up to steam much faster

Trevor Hartford March 04, 2006 12:51PM

Re: bring a cold engine up to steam much faster

Bruce R. Pier February 26, 2006 11:52AM

EYE OF THE BEHOLDER

Ron Keagle March 03, 2006 12:04PM

Re: Short Memories and relativity

J.B.Bane March 03, 2006 08:28PM

Scrubber Question:

Ron Keagle March 07, 2006 08:09AM

Re: EYE OF THE BEHOLDER

Andy Miller March 07, 2006 07:58PM

Re: EYE OF THE BEHOLDER

Ron Keagle March 07, 2006 10:38PM

You jus doan get it

Mik March 08, 2006 03:30AM

Re: You jus doan get it

G. W. Laepple March 08, 2006 04:47AM

Re: You jus doan get it

Bon Mot March 08, 2006 10:51AM

Re: EYE OF THE BEHOLDER

Andy Miller March 08, 2006 04:45PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.