Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

EYE OF THE BEHOLDER

March 03, 2006 12:04PM
The most difficult part about fixing this problem is that the problem has not been defined. Apparently D&S emissions are not in violation of any laws, aside from the fact that the D&S may be exempt from state and local regulation. This whole smoke problem is in the eyes of the beholders. I would submit that the very idea of coal smoke is just as offensive to some people as actually smelling it. Therefore, the remedy is anybody’s guess.
Most people have a reasonable attitude toward the environment, but there is a large number who hold a view that might be described as zero tolerance. Their attitude toward the environment is closer to a religion than to science. This attitude is exemplified in the comment by Wano Urbonas, the environmental health director of the San Juan Basin Health Department, when he said, “There’s no pollution level that’s safe.”
I’ll bet that this assumption is espoused in environmental seminars around the world, yet it has no scientific basis whatsoever. As an emotional call to arms, however, it is like a blank check to declare war on any amount of any type of air borne emission, and either ban it or tax and regulate it.
RK
Subject Author Posted

A CLEAN CHOO-CHOO

Ron Keagle February 26, 2006 09:31AM

bring a cold engine up to steam much faster

Douglas vV February 26, 2006 09:41AM

Re: bring a cold engine up to steam much faster

Bruce R. Pier February 26, 2006 10:27AM

Re: bring a cold engine up to steam much faster

Ron Keagle February 26, 2006 11:20AM

Re: bring a cold engine up to steam much faster

Douglas vV February 26, 2006 11:36AM

Re: bring a cold engine up to steam much faster

earl February 26, 2006 12:02PM

Re: bring a cold engine up to steam much faster

Ron Keagle February 26, 2006 12:15PM

Re: bring a cold engine up to steam much faster

John Cole February 26, 2006 06:23PM

Even Old Sol is guilty!

Bill February 26, 2006 07:20PM

Re: bring a cold engine up to steam much faster *LINK*

Hugh Odom February 27, 2006 04:29AM

HISTORICAL MISSION

Ron Keagle February 28, 2006 01:26PM

Re: HISTORICAL MISSION *LINK*

Hugh Odom February 28, 2006 06:14PM

SMOKE

Ron Keagle March 02, 2006 10:21AM

Re: SMOKE

G. W. Laepple March 02, 2006 12:40PM

Re: SMOKE

Dittmer March 02, 2006 05:28PM

Re: bring a cold engine up to steam much faster

Kelly Anderson March 03, 2006 06:07AM

Re: bring a cold engine up to steam much faster

John Craft March 03, 2006 08:16AM

Re: bring a cold engine up to steam much faster

Kelly Anderson March 03, 2006 08:54AM

Re: ... smoke ...

El Curmudgeonito March 07, 2006 12:11AM

Re: bring a cold engine up to steam much faster

Douglas vV March 03, 2006 08:40AM

Re: bring a cold engine up to steam much faster

Hugh Odom March 03, 2006 06:59PM

Re: bring a cold engine up to steam much faster *LINK*

Hugh Odom March 03, 2006 07:02PM

Re: bring a cold engine up to steam much faster

Trevor Hartford March 04, 2006 12:51PM

Re: bring a cold engine up to steam much faster

Bruce R. Pier February 26, 2006 11:52AM

EYE OF THE BEHOLDER

Ron Keagle March 03, 2006 12:04PM

Re: Short Memories and relativity

J.B.Bane March 03, 2006 08:28PM

Scrubber Question:

Ron Keagle March 07, 2006 08:09AM

Re: EYE OF THE BEHOLDER

Andy Miller March 07, 2006 07:58PM

Re: EYE OF THE BEHOLDER

Ron Keagle March 07, 2006 10:38PM

You jus doan get it

Mik March 08, 2006 03:30AM

Re: You jus doan get it

G. W. Laepple March 08, 2006 04:47AM

Re: You jus doan get it

Bon Mot March 08, 2006 10:51AM

Re: EYE OF THE BEHOLDER

Andy Miller March 08, 2006 04:45PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.