Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Re: Question about the term "double heading"

Forum List Message List New Topic Print View

Scott Turner

December 31, 2005 12:59PM

Scott; If the flats were for MOW work at Cumbres, it would be logical to place them between the helper and the road engines. That would avoid the necessity of cutting the road engine off of the rest of the train when they were dropped.
Jim, I agree. In fact, that was part of the point I was trying to make in my usual stumbling way. That this particular configuration allows the train to traverse Lobato without stopping is a nice side-benefit, but most likely not the primary reason for doing it - and certainly not the norm for standard operations.
Scott

Reply Quote

Message List Previous Message Next Message

RSS

Subject	Author	Posted
Question about the term "double heading"	Erik W	December 29, 2005 10:08AM
Re: Question about the term "double heading"	Nick Gully	December 29, 2005 10:41AM
Re: Question about the term "double heading"	John West	December 29, 2005 11:44AM
Re: Question about the term "double heading"	Scott Turner	December 29, 2005 06:52PM
Re: July 15th, 2004 PIC	John Hillier	December 29, 2005 08:50PM
Re: July 15th, 2004 NM PIC	John Hillier	December 29, 2005 08:51PM
Re: July 15th, 2004	Scott Turner	December 29, 2005 08:53PM
Re: July 15th, 2004 PIC	John Hillier	December 29, 2005 08:58PM
6500 flats	Josh McNeal	December 30, 2005 10:54AM
Re: 6500 flats	Erik W	December 30, 2005 11:42AM
Re: 6500 flats	Scott Turner	December 30, 2005 05:02PM
Re: 6500 flats	Douglas vV	December 30, 2005 01:13PM
6509 and 6544	Kevin Cook	December 30, 2005 01:15PM
Re: Question about the term "double heading"	Mike Trent	December 29, 2005 02:51PM
Re: Question about the term "double heading"	Leverett Fernald	December 30, 2005 04:50PM
Re: Question about the term "double heading"	Jon Waldon	December 30, 2005 05:34PM
Re: Question about the term "double heading"	Jim Adams	December 30, 2005 08:55PM
Re: Question about the term "double heading"	Jon Waldon	December 30, 2005 09:10PM
Re: Question about the term "double heading"	Jim Adams	December 31, 2005 01:33AM
Re: Question about the term "double heading"	Scott Turner	December 31, 2005 09:29AM
Re: Question about the term "double heading"	Jon Waldon	December 31, 2005 10:19AM
Re: Question about the term "double heading"	John Sporseen	December 31, 2005 10:40AM
Re: Question about the term "double heading"	Scott Turner	December 31, 2005 11:39AM
Re: Question about the term "double heading"	Jim Adams	December 31, 2005 12:47PM
Re: Question about the term "double heading"	Scott Turner	December 31, 2005 12:59PM
Re: Question about the term "double heading"	stuart olson	December 31, 2005 05:18PM
Re: Question about the term "double heading"	Jon Waldon	December 31, 2005 05:48PM
Re: Question about the term "double heading"	stuart olson	December 31, 2005 07:06PM
Re: Question about the term "double heading"	earl	January 03, 2006 09:17AM
Re: Question about the term "double heading"	Jim Adams	January 03, 2006 11:00AM

Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.

488 stops for water at Los Pinos tank on closing day Oct. 1979. Photo courtesy Don Richter

The NGDF was started by Don Richter and is currently operated in his memory by Nathan Holmes and others. Others who have contributed to the upkeep of this board are (in no particular order): Charles McCandless, Everett Lueck, Ted Wilton, Cole Adams, James Bane, John Moellmer, Jon Bentz, Linn Moedinger, lloyd lehrer, Rod Jensen, John Craft, Steven Forney, Herb Kelsey, Bill Ramaley, Russ Sperry (El Russo Loco), Josh McNeal, John West, Jim Armstrong, Bob Bergstrom, Greg Scholl, Blake Forbes Doug van Veelen and Mark Fuller.