Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Question about the term "double heading"

December 31, 2005 09:29AM
It is my opinion the flats were included in the consist to distribute the weight of the engines and
avoid this time consuming maneuver.

While that might seem logical, it was not the case. I was told the flats were going to the top of the pass for some MOW work, and they were, indeed, dropped off atop the pass and the lead locomotive ran light back to Chama.
I've not seen this consist or anything like it repeated since, and doubleheaders up Cumbres (which were run reasonably often after this date in '04, and even more commonly in '05 with 488 coming back on line) are still run as true doubleheaders on the C&TS.
I would hazard a guess that running in this configuration would be a tricky proposition, but that's just an amateur's under-educated opinion. Someone who has real experience and knows what they're talking about might comment.
Scott
Subject Author Posted

Question about the term "double heading"

Erik W December 29, 2005 10:08AM

Re: Question about the term "double heading"

Nick Gully December 29, 2005 10:41AM

Re: Question about the term "double heading"

John West December 29, 2005 11:44AM

Re: Question about the term "double heading"

Scott Turner December 29, 2005 06:52PM

Re: July 15th, 2004 *PIC*

John Hillier December 29, 2005 08:50PM

Re: July 15th, 2004 *NM* *PIC*

John Hillier December 29, 2005 08:51PM

Re: July 15th, 2004

Scott Turner December 29, 2005 08:53PM

Re: July 15th, 2004 *PIC*

John Hillier December 29, 2005 08:58PM

6500 flats

Josh McNeal December 30, 2005 10:54AM

Re: 6500 flats

Erik W December 30, 2005 11:42AM

Re: 6500 flats

Scott Turner December 30, 2005 05:02PM

Re: 6500 flats

Douglas vV December 30, 2005 01:13PM

6509 and 6544

Kevin Cook December 30, 2005 01:15PM

Re: Question about the term "double heading"

Mike Trent December 29, 2005 02:51PM

Re: Question about the term "double heading"

Leverett Fernald December 30, 2005 04:50PM

Re: Question about the term "double heading"

Jon Waldon December 30, 2005 05:34PM

Re: Question about the term "double heading"

Jim Adams December 30, 2005 08:55PM

Re: Question about the term "double heading"

Jon Waldon December 30, 2005 09:10PM

Re: Question about the term "double heading"

Jim Adams December 31, 2005 01:33AM

Re: Question about the term "double heading"

Scott Turner December 31, 2005 09:29AM

Re: Question about the term "double heading"

Jon Waldon December 31, 2005 10:19AM

Re: Question about the term "double heading"

John Sporseen December 31, 2005 10:40AM

Re: Question about the term "double heading"

Scott Turner December 31, 2005 11:39AM

Re: Question about the term "double heading"

Jim Adams December 31, 2005 12:47PM

Re: Question about the term "double heading"

Scott Turner December 31, 2005 12:59PM

Re: Question about the term "double heading"

stuart olson December 31, 2005 05:18PM

Re: Question about the term "double heading"

Jon Waldon December 31, 2005 05:48PM

Re: Question about the term "double heading"

stuart olson December 31, 2005 07:06PM

Re: Question about the term "double heading"

earl January 03, 2006 09:17AM

Re: Question about the term "double heading"

Jim Adams January 03, 2006 11:00AM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.