Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Question about the term "double heading"

December 29, 2005 02:51PM
This doesn't answer your question, but reminds me of a great story.
Years ago, there was an old engineer in Alamosa who was thinking about retirement and decided he wanted to try his hand at farming.
He went out with a local realtor to see a place that was up for sale. The realtor asked if he knew anything about farming and the old railroader said he didn't and they spent the next half hour or so checking things out.
As the realtor droned on about the house and the outbuildings, the engineer, looking out a window said, "Hold the phone. I ain't buyin this place."
The realtor asked why, and the old man said, "The ground is too hard."
The realtor, puzzled, looked out the window and saw nothing but a couple of hogs making time in a pen outside. He turned to the old man and said, "I thought you said you didn't know anything about farming. How could you possibly know the ground is too hard?"
The engineer looked out at the pen and said, "I don't know nothing about farming, but I know the ground is too damn hard if the hogs have to doublehead to root!"
(Apologies to Woody Woodward, I hope I told this well enough!)
Subject Author Posted

Question about the term "double heading"

Erik W December 29, 2005 10:08AM

Re: Question about the term "double heading"

Nick Gully December 29, 2005 10:41AM

Re: Question about the term "double heading"

John West December 29, 2005 11:44AM

Re: Question about the term "double heading"

Scott Turner December 29, 2005 06:52PM

Re: July 15th, 2004 *PIC*

John Hillier December 29, 2005 08:50PM

Re: July 15th, 2004 *NM* *PIC*

John Hillier December 29, 2005 08:51PM

Re: July 15th, 2004

Scott Turner December 29, 2005 08:53PM

Re: July 15th, 2004 *PIC*

John Hillier December 29, 2005 08:58PM

6500 flats

Josh McNeal December 30, 2005 10:54AM

Re: 6500 flats

Erik W December 30, 2005 11:42AM

Re: 6500 flats

Scott Turner December 30, 2005 05:02PM

Re: 6500 flats

Douglas vV December 30, 2005 01:13PM

6509 and 6544

Kevin Cook December 30, 2005 01:15PM

Re: Question about the term "double heading"

Mike Trent December 29, 2005 02:51PM

Re: Question about the term "double heading"

Leverett Fernald December 30, 2005 04:50PM

Re: Question about the term "double heading"

Jon Waldon December 30, 2005 05:34PM

Re: Question about the term "double heading"

Jim Adams December 30, 2005 08:55PM

Re: Question about the term "double heading"

Jon Waldon December 30, 2005 09:10PM

Re: Question about the term "double heading"

Jim Adams December 31, 2005 01:33AM

Re: Question about the term "double heading"

Scott Turner December 31, 2005 09:29AM

Re: Question about the term "double heading"

Jon Waldon December 31, 2005 10:19AM

Re: Question about the term "double heading"

John Sporseen December 31, 2005 10:40AM

Re: Question about the term "double heading"

Scott Turner December 31, 2005 11:39AM

Re: Question about the term "double heading"

Jim Adams December 31, 2005 12:47PM

Re: Question about the term "double heading"

Scott Turner December 31, 2005 12:59PM

Re: Question about the term "double heading"

stuart olson December 31, 2005 05:18PM

Re: Question about the term "double heading"

Jon Waldon December 31, 2005 05:48PM

Re: Question about the term "double heading"

stuart olson December 31, 2005 07:06PM

Re: Question about the term "double heading"

earl January 03, 2006 09:17AM

Re: Question about the term "double heading"

Jim Adams January 03, 2006 11:00AM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.