Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Oil and the future

August 13, 2005 10:40PM
I subscribe to the premise that the "cheap oil" era is over.
Ten years from now $80 per barrel oil might seem like quite a bargain.
I doubt that coal fired steam locomotives, at least as we relate to them, will ever return. Although they might capture fuel cost savings, they are still maintanance dependent machines, and labor costs to keep them running would probably far exceed any economic savings from fuel costs. I suppose that technology could assure stack emmission acceptance, but the era of burning the sulfur ladened coal of past eras would probably not be an option.
It would seem logical that coal would be an economical fuel on dedicated unit train runs to and from the Powder River Basin, but does the coal leaving that area have enough BTU yield to be a suitable railroad fuel?
I would have loved to have seen the 614 pulling a freight or coal consist. I rode behind her on a passenger excursion from St. Louis to Flora, Illinois. It's probably esoteric, but she just seemed to have a certain finesse, that the UP 8444 lacked.
I have some impages of 614 at work. Is there any simple way to link them to this board?
Subject Author Posted

Oil and the future

Pat August 12, 2005 08:37PM

Re: Oil and the future

JasonL. August 12, 2005 09:58PM

Re: Oil and the future

Donald Foster August 13, 2005 02:48PM

Re: Oil and the future

Greg Scholl August 13, 2005 04:05PM

Re: Oil and the future

John Wilke August 13, 2005 10:40PM

Re: Oil and the future

Pat August 14, 2005 05:05AM

Re: Oil and the future *LINK*

Hugh Odom August 15, 2005 04:25AM

Re: Oil and the future

Greg Scholl August 15, 2005 07:24AM

Blasting through Thurmond *PIC*

Greg Scholl August 15, 2005 07:28AM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.