Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Note also,

July 21, 2005 09:05PM
Terry,
It matters that readers at this board have been told numerous times by CHS and its supporters that the #9 would be running in June, then July, then by the end of the season. This was an obvious impossibility to anyone with even the slightest idea of what it takes to restore these machines.
I have wondered many times why these lies continued to be told and in many cases believed.
It goes to the core of credibility to the entire new operation, which includes CHS and Railstar, and their employees and supporters.
As to your comment about some of us acting like we "own" this equipment, I have donated thousands of dollars of my own money and hundreds of hours of my own time (along with several others) into the care and maintenance of Boulder's Park engine #30/74, which finds itself a pawn in this scenario. So I do have a vested interest in what is going on and if you don't like it, tough.
I have not said anything negative about Railstar, which is in a precarious position, and I wish them well. I think it is extremely interesting that out of the blue yesterday some information was revealed to us that finally begins to make some sense as to the "restoration" of #9 and its return to the loop, and here you are whining about us being negative.
Why don't you go back and reread some of what you are being critical of and lighten up?
I can speak only for myself, but I can damn sure do that.
Subject Author Posted

Recent 9 Update *LINK*

Ed Kelley July 20, 2005 01:30PM

Interesting, Thanks

Mike Trent July 20, 2005 02:57PM

Note also,

Dave Bates July 20, 2005 03:39PM

Compare with others

Michael Allen July 20, 2005 07:02PM

Uhrich Contract

Mike Trent July 20, 2005 08:46PM

Re: Uhrich Contract

Daniel Maxwell July 22, 2005 04:56AM

Re: Uhrich Contract

Mike Trent July 22, 2005 06:45AM

Re: Note also,

Terry Van Schwartz July 21, 2005 08:33PM

Re: Note also,

Mike Trent July 21, 2005 09:05PM

Re: Note also,

Terry Van Schwartz July 22, 2005 05:24PM

Re: Recent 9 Update

J. B. Bowers July 20, 2005 02:59PM

Re: Recent 9 Update

John Kyler July 20, 2005 03:01PM

Re: Recent 9 Update

Jim Poston July 21, 2005 08:00AM

Re: Recent 9 Update

Steve Stockham July 21, 2005 08:27AM

Re: Recent 9 Update

Matthew July 21, 2005 01:54PM

You can't be serious.....

Mike Trent July 21, 2005 09:16PM

Re: You can't be serious..... *LINK*

Jim Poston July 22, 2005 06:57AM

That Explains Everything

Mike Trent July 22, 2005 08:22AM

Re: You can't be serious.....

Steven Torrico July 22, 2005 08:43AM

Re: You can't be serious.....

Daniel Maxwell July 22, 2005 09:11AM

Re: You can't be serious..... *LINK*

Don Richter July 22, 2005 09:41AM

Re: You can't be serious.....

Steven Torrico July 22, 2005 09:48AM

Re: You can't be serious.....

Steve Singer July 22, 2005 01:41PM

Additional Work?

Jim Poston July 21, 2005 08:19AM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.