Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Uhrich Contract

July 20, 2005 08:46PM
Again, Uhrich is quoted only as saying that #9 would be ready to be returned to the Loop in three weeks, not that it would be ready to run in three weeks.
It is obvious that #9 is virtually no closer to being operational than it was a month ago or 2 years ago. If they are estimating that 30/74 will take between 2 to 3 years to complete, then somebody else will have to finish #9, because it will take nearly that long as well.
Don't anyone get excited. I don't see this as anybody lying, but I do think that no one has considered the actual scope of Uhrich's contract.
If they were only contracted to evaluate the engine for restoration (which is what I seem to recall from months ago), restore the cab and a few other odds and ends, then they are indeed almost finished.
Be interesting to see what happens next, but it won't be to see #9 under steam. Not this year, and not next year either, in all likelyhood.
Subject Author Posted

Recent 9 Update *LINK*

Ed Kelley July 20, 2005 01:30PM

Interesting, Thanks

Mike Trent July 20, 2005 02:57PM

Note also,

Dave Bates July 20, 2005 03:39PM

Compare with others

Michael Allen July 20, 2005 07:02PM

Uhrich Contract

Mike Trent July 20, 2005 08:46PM

Re: Uhrich Contract

Daniel Maxwell July 22, 2005 04:56AM

Re: Uhrich Contract

Mike Trent July 22, 2005 06:45AM

Re: Note also,

Terry Van Schwartz July 21, 2005 08:33PM

Re: Note also,

Mike Trent July 21, 2005 09:05PM

Re: Note also,

Terry Van Schwartz July 22, 2005 05:24PM

Re: Recent 9 Update

J. B. Bowers July 20, 2005 02:59PM

Re: Recent 9 Update

John Kyler July 20, 2005 03:01PM

Re: Recent 9 Update

Jim Poston July 21, 2005 08:00AM

Re: Recent 9 Update

Steve Stockham July 21, 2005 08:27AM

Re: Recent 9 Update

Matthew July 21, 2005 01:54PM

You can't be serious.....

Mike Trent July 21, 2005 09:16PM

Re: You can't be serious..... *LINK*

Jim Poston July 22, 2005 06:57AM

That Explains Everything

Mike Trent July 22, 2005 08:22AM

Re: You can't be serious.....

Steven Torrico July 22, 2005 08:43AM

Re: You can't be serious.....

Daniel Maxwell July 22, 2005 09:11AM

Re: You can't be serious..... *LINK*

Don Richter July 22, 2005 09:41AM

Re: You can't be serious.....

Steven Torrico July 22, 2005 09:48AM

Re: You can't be serious.....

Steve Singer July 22, 2005 01:41PM

Additional Work?

Jim Poston July 21, 2005 08:19AM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.