Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Please Try to Be Considerate

June 21, 2005 01:50AM
I've done a share of preserving a part of history, and in my business dealings have always respected copyrights and ownership with credit lines, but that wasn't the point. As I stated in my previous message it was in support of your position that no other individual has a 'right' to the material you have collected or unearthed by your own personal research and artifact gathering, no matter what they think. The demands made which you described are totally out of bounds. I fully understand what can drive peopel to shredding their life's work, even if I think it borders on the criminal to do so.
What I am saying is once you have no more use for the materials, they are still important to our cultural heritage, and no telling that someone in 2656 going through some archive in a library won't find some bit you saved as critical to understanding our past. Anyone with a collection of anything has preserved things for future generations, not for the boors that demand the information of you now. Well, maybe my string collection isn't so important. The "it belongs to everyone" is meant to apply to a public or private library that is dedicated to preserving such works. Anyone who thinks they are "in the right" to destroy whatever thay have clearly doesn't see past their own nose, which they are so willing to cut off for spite.
I recently read Bruce MacGregor's book, "The Birth of California Narrow Gauge", and he indicated that almost all of the Carter Brothers drawings, records and papers are nowhere to be found, lost to us all. It would certainly be a shame if those were once in a private collector's hands and they decided to burn the lot rather than let 'so and so' get them.
How much of what we do have was rescued in the wee hours from dumpsters when a fallen flag railroad office was cleaned out? DeGolyer has preserved Baldwin records for us all. What about Rogers or Cook or Schenectady? Some we have left, some we don't.
The only thing I am advocating is that those who have created a collection of work that is important, consider finding an avenue to share that information at a later date, even if that means it sits in a box in the archives of some library or museum and doesn't see the light of day for 50 years. A case in point is the records of the Tonopah and Tidewater, which are in some 30-40 boxes in the Huntington Library. Only serious researchers even have a chance to gain access to such materials. Find a way to share with future generations if the current ones don't suit you. Destruction just erases a bit more of our past.
Subject Author Posted

confetti letter??

Craig LeVay June 10, 2005 07:45PM

Re: confetti letter??

Frank Martindell June 11, 2005 09:06AM

Re: confetti letter??

Craig LeVay June 14, 2005 12:04PM

Re: confetti letter??

Mike Stillwell June 14, 2005 12:11PM

Re: confetti letter??

Don Richter June 14, 2005 12:13PM

Re: confetti letter??

Don Richter June 14, 2005 12:18PM

Re: confetti letter??

Rick Renz June 14, 2005 01:25PM

(Message Deleted by Poster)

Craig LeVay June 14, 2005 01:27PM

Re: confetti letter?? (very long winded) *LINK* *PIC*

Gavin Hamilton June 14, 2005 02:55PM

Re: confetti letter?? (very long winded)

Steve Singer June 14, 2005 05:02PM

Re: confetti letter?? (very long winded)

Craig LeVay June 15, 2005 07:35PM

Re: confetti letter?? (very long winded) *LINK*

Gavin Hamilton June 16, 2005 06:22AM

Re: confetti letter?? (very long winded)

Craig LeVay June 17, 2005 01:02PM

Re: confetti letter?? (very long winded) *LINK*

greg scholl June 16, 2005 06:55AM

Re: confetti letter??

eric bracher June 14, 2005 01:42PM

WHAT A STUPID LOSER!!!

Jason Midyette June 14, 2005 03:48PM

(Message Deleted by Poster)

Steve Stockham June 14, 2005 04:03PM

Re: WHAT A STUPID LOSER!!!

eric bracher June 14, 2005 04:55PM

Re: Why say his Name??

Kevin K. June 15, 2005 02:34AM

Re: WHAT A STUPID LOSER!!!

Rick McKinnie June 14, 2005 05:00PM

Re: WHAT A STUPID LOSER!!!

Craig LeVay June 15, 2005 07:18AM

Re: WHAT A STUPID LOSER!!!

Don Richter June 15, 2005 08:04AM

maybe other problems!

RBrinton June 15, 2005 08:29AM

Re: maybe other problems!

Jerry June 15, 2005 08:49AM

Re: maybe other problems!

Mik June 15, 2005 06:24PM

Re: maybe other problems!

Skonk June 15, 2005 06:53PM

Re: WHAT A STUPID LOSER!!!

Mike Paladino June 17, 2005 01:40PM

Re: What the...?

Curtis F June 17, 2005 07:31PM

Re: WHAT A STUPID LOSER!!!

Jason Midyette June 17, 2005 08:11PM

Re: WHAT A STUPID LOSER!!!

Gavin Hamilton June 18, 2005 05:22AM

(Message Deleted by Poster)

Steve Stockham June 18, 2005 11:06AM

Re: WHAT A STUPID LOSER!!!

Gavin Hamilton June 19, 2005 10:21AM

Re: WHAT A STUPID LOSER!!!

Joe P June 19, 2005 09:56PM

Re: WHAT A STUPID LOSER!!!

Trevor Hartford June 20, 2005 08:40PM

Re: confetti letter?? *LINK*

Cameron Wallace June 14, 2005 04:14PM

And the house...

Michael Lumert June 15, 2005 08:12AM

Please Try to Be Considerate

Mike Trent June 18, 2005 03:16PM

Be Nice & Money

roger hogan June 18, 2005 05:55PM

Right ON!! ... Roger

WP&Ymike June 19, 2005 07:24PM

(Message Deleted by Poster)

Steve Stockham June 19, 2005 09:21PM

Re: Right ON!! ... Roger

WP&Ymike June 19, 2005 10:41PM

Re: Please Try to Be Considerate

Al Patterson June 18, 2005 08:15PM

(Message Deleted by Poster)

Steve Stockham June 18, 2005 09:07PM

Re: Please Try to Be Considerate

Mike Trent June 19, 2005 11:13AM

Re: Please Try to Be Considerate

Dr. Froid June 19, 2005 11:41AM

Re: Please Try to Be Considerate

Jason Midyette June 19, 2005 07:55PM

Re: Please Try to Be Considerate

Gavin Hamilton June 20, 2005 07:41AM

Re: Please Try to Be Considerate

Philip Walters June 20, 2005 08:07AM

Re: Please Try to Be Considerate

Jerry Day June 20, 2005 07:40AM

Well said, Jerry!

Ed Stabler June 20, 2005 07:48AM

PLEASE Try to Be Considerate

Don Richter June 20, 2005 08:26AM

Re: PLEASE Try to Be Considerate

rick b June 20, 2005 10:18AM

Re: Please Try to Be Considerate

rick b June 20, 2005 10:13AM

Re: Please Try to Be Considerate

Jerry Day June 20, 2005 10:36AM

Re: Please Try to Be Considerate

Craig LeVay June 20, 2005 01:09PM

Re: Please Try to Be Considerate

Steve Singer June 20, 2005 01:38PM

Re: Please Try to Be Considerate

Lon Wall June 20, 2005 03:20PM

Re: Please Try to Be Considerate

PRSL June 20, 2005 10:34PM

Re: Please Try to Be Considerate

rick b June 21, 2005 01:50AM

Re: Craig LeVay--explain your post please

PRSL June 21, 2005 09:29PM

Re: Craig LeVay--explain your post please

Dusty Burman June 21, 2005 10:18PM

Re: Craig LeVay--explain your post please

Craig LeVay June 22, 2005 06:52AM

Re: confetti letter-11days-BIG RUSE!!

PRSL June 21, 2005 04:55PM

Ha Ha--not at all funny!!!!!!!!!!

William Reed June 21, 2005 05:29PM

Re: confetti letter-11days-BIG RUSE!!

Herb Kelsey June 21, 2005 05:31PM

Re: confetti letter-11days-BIG RUSE!!

Jason Midyette June 21, 2005 05:36PM

Re: Time to reread the guidelines

Philip Walters June 21, 2005 06:32PM

Re: confetti letter-11days-BIG RUSE!!

PRSL June 21, 2005 07:36PM

Gawd Damm IT

Don Richter June 22, 2005 10:10AM

Re: Gawd Damm IT

James J. Genat June 25, 2005 06:34AM

Re: confetti letter-11days-BIG RUSE!!

Mike Trent June 21, 2005 07:45PM

Re:Absolutely Amazing!! *NM*

J.B.Bane June 21, 2005 09:23PM

Indeed.

Mike Trent June 22, 2005 07:17PM

Re: confetti letter-credibility destroyed

WP&Ymike June 22, 2005 12:07AM

Re: confetti letter-credibility destroyed

Craig LeVay June 22, 2005 07:03AM

No Ruse

Mike Paladino June 22, 2005 03:16PM

Completely confused....

Rodger Polley June 22, 2005 07:54PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.