Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: confetti letter?? (very long winded)

June 17, 2005 01:02PM
Dear Gavin,
Thank you for the quick and courteous reply.
______________________________
(snippet)
>>I have found that parts of my own website have been "lifted" by other webmasters, a Spanish author who didn't ask but did mention Snr. Hamilton in the credits (but got the URL wrong), it is mentioned in a Brazilian book about articulated steam locomotives (with the correct URL) and information has been used by a UK magazine without prior permission. In each case I would have given assent to the use as long as credit was given. I have deliberately made the pictures too low resolution for publication purposes.
>>There have been several cases that I know of where publications and organisations, both commercial and governmental, have taken pictures from the internet and used them without, at the very least, credit being given. I've got to the stage where I'm giving serious consideration to "water marking" all the pictures on my site - probably with the words "some thieving b*stard stole this image from....."
__________________________________
This seems to be a growing problem not only in the internet but amongst those who are supposed researchers and aspiring narrow gauge authors.
Materials that are innocently loaned years before with great makings on the back of photograph (i.e. not for publication, property of so-and-so's collection, etc.) get turned into sometimes strange and erroneous articles and the original loaner is either thoroughly embarassed or explantions to be made to the original museum or collection it came from.
I know of several people that collect old photographs of the West of military installations, Indians, settlers, ranchers, etc. that have been putting a watermark logo on the front to give some idea where these photos come from when they show up later on a website or publication.
Second thing I have been noting from the hobby fraternity (and it is not only narrow gaugers) has been the constant demands to "feed me" like baby birds, new information. If we are tired of sharing because there is no thanks or even an acknowledgment of the effort on your part towards another researcher.
From my own experience, I recently burned a CD of dozens of pictures of Tipis and accountrements (another of my interests) for a woman who was researching a tipi book and did not even get the acknowledgment or thanks for the effort.
I think "Confetti Man" is just in some way tired of the rabble feeling cheated if they are not fed constantly all the time.
Another spike (or bone) to chew on.
btw...give the kitty some more bread...
cheers,
Craig LeVay
Subject Author Posted

confetti letter??

Craig LeVay June 10, 2005 07:45PM

Re: confetti letter??

Frank Martindell June 11, 2005 09:06AM

Re: confetti letter??

Craig LeVay June 14, 2005 12:04PM

Re: confetti letter??

Mike Stillwell June 14, 2005 12:11PM

Re: confetti letter??

Don Richter June 14, 2005 12:13PM

Re: confetti letter??

Don Richter June 14, 2005 12:18PM

Re: confetti letter??

Rick Renz June 14, 2005 01:25PM

(Message Deleted by Poster)

Craig LeVay June 14, 2005 01:27PM

Re: confetti letter?? (very long winded) *LINK* *PIC*

Gavin Hamilton June 14, 2005 02:55PM

Re: confetti letter?? (very long winded)

Steve Singer June 14, 2005 05:02PM

Re: confetti letter?? (very long winded)

Craig LeVay June 15, 2005 07:35PM

Re: confetti letter?? (very long winded) *LINK*

Gavin Hamilton June 16, 2005 06:22AM

Re: confetti letter?? (very long winded)

Craig LeVay June 17, 2005 01:02PM

Re: confetti letter?? (very long winded) *LINK*

greg scholl June 16, 2005 06:55AM

Re: confetti letter??

eric bracher June 14, 2005 01:42PM

WHAT A STUPID LOSER!!!

Jason Midyette June 14, 2005 03:48PM

(Message Deleted by Poster)

Steve Stockham June 14, 2005 04:03PM

Re: WHAT A STUPID LOSER!!!

eric bracher June 14, 2005 04:55PM

Re: Why say his Name??

Kevin K. June 15, 2005 02:34AM

Re: WHAT A STUPID LOSER!!!

Rick McKinnie June 14, 2005 05:00PM

Re: WHAT A STUPID LOSER!!!

Craig LeVay June 15, 2005 07:18AM

Re: WHAT A STUPID LOSER!!!

Don Richter June 15, 2005 08:04AM

maybe other problems!

RBrinton June 15, 2005 08:29AM

Re: maybe other problems!

Jerry June 15, 2005 08:49AM

Re: maybe other problems!

Mik June 15, 2005 06:24PM

Re: maybe other problems!

Skonk June 15, 2005 06:53PM

Re: WHAT A STUPID LOSER!!!

Mike Paladino June 17, 2005 01:40PM

Re: What the...?

Curtis F June 17, 2005 07:31PM

Re: WHAT A STUPID LOSER!!!

Jason Midyette June 17, 2005 08:11PM

Re: WHAT A STUPID LOSER!!!

Gavin Hamilton June 18, 2005 05:22AM

(Message Deleted by Poster)

Steve Stockham June 18, 2005 11:06AM

Re: WHAT A STUPID LOSER!!!

Gavin Hamilton June 19, 2005 10:21AM

Re: WHAT A STUPID LOSER!!!

Joe P June 19, 2005 09:56PM

Re: WHAT A STUPID LOSER!!!

Trevor Hartford June 20, 2005 08:40PM

Re: confetti letter?? *LINK*

Cameron Wallace June 14, 2005 04:14PM

And the house...

Michael Lumert June 15, 2005 08:12AM

Please Try to Be Considerate

Mike Trent June 18, 2005 03:16PM

Be Nice & Money

roger hogan June 18, 2005 05:55PM

Right ON!! ... Roger

WP&Ymike June 19, 2005 07:24PM

(Message Deleted by Poster)

Steve Stockham June 19, 2005 09:21PM

Re: Right ON!! ... Roger

WP&Ymike June 19, 2005 10:41PM

Re: Please Try to Be Considerate

Al Patterson June 18, 2005 08:15PM

(Message Deleted by Poster)

Steve Stockham June 18, 2005 09:07PM

Re: Please Try to Be Considerate

Mike Trent June 19, 2005 11:13AM

Re: Please Try to Be Considerate

Dr. Froid June 19, 2005 11:41AM

Re: Please Try to Be Considerate

Jason Midyette June 19, 2005 07:55PM

Re: Please Try to Be Considerate

Gavin Hamilton June 20, 2005 07:41AM

Re: Please Try to Be Considerate

Philip Walters June 20, 2005 08:07AM

Re: Please Try to Be Considerate

Jerry Day June 20, 2005 07:40AM

Well said, Jerry!

Ed Stabler June 20, 2005 07:48AM

PLEASE Try to Be Considerate

Don Richter June 20, 2005 08:26AM

Re: PLEASE Try to Be Considerate

rick b June 20, 2005 10:18AM

Re: Please Try to Be Considerate

rick b June 20, 2005 10:13AM

Re: Please Try to Be Considerate

Jerry Day June 20, 2005 10:36AM

Re: Please Try to Be Considerate

Craig LeVay June 20, 2005 01:09PM

Re: Please Try to Be Considerate

Steve Singer June 20, 2005 01:38PM

Re: Please Try to Be Considerate

Lon Wall June 20, 2005 03:20PM

Re: Please Try to Be Considerate

PRSL June 20, 2005 10:34PM

Re: Please Try to Be Considerate

rick b June 21, 2005 01:50AM

Re: Craig LeVay--explain your post please

PRSL June 21, 2005 09:29PM

Re: Craig LeVay--explain your post please

Dusty Burman June 21, 2005 10:18PM

Re: Craig LeVay--explain your post please

Craig LeVay June 22, 2005 06:52AM

Re: confetti letter-11days-BIG RUSE!!

PRSL June 21, 2005 04:55PM

Ha Ha--not at all funny!!!!!!!!!!

William Reed June 21, 2005 05:29PM

Re: confetti letter-11days-BIG RUSE!!

Herb Kelsey June 21, 2005 05:31PM

Re: confetti letter-11days-BIG RUSE!!

Jason Midyette June 21, 2005 05:36PM

Re: Time to reread the guidelines

Philip Walters June 21, 2005 06:32PM

Re: confetti letter-11days-BIG RUSE!!

PRSL June 21, 2005 07:36PM

Gawd Damm IT

Don Richter June 22, 2005 10:10AM

Re: Gawd Damm IT

James J. Genat June 25, 2005 06:34AM

Re: confetti letter-11days-BIG RUSE!!

Mike Trent June 21, 2005 07:45PM

Re:Absolutely Amazing!! *NM*

J.B.Bane June 21, 2005 09:23PM

Indeed.

Mike Trent June 22, 2005 07:17PM

Re: confetti letter-credibility destroyed

WP&Ymike June 22, 2005 12:07AM

Re: confetti letter-credibility destroyed

Craig LeVay June 22, 2005 07:03AM

No Ruse

Mike Paladino June 22, 2005 03:16PM

Completely confused....

Rodger Polley June 22, 2005 07:54PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.