Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: D&RGW # 278

April 21, 2005 02:49AM
The City of Montrose owns the engine and caboose. The city has put the NPS on notice that it is in violation of the agreement for the current bridge display because the NPS has failed to perform required maintenance. The NPS is going after budget money that would eventually see the engine and cars removed from the bridge and be restored, again, and then put on display with the other ng equipment at Cimmaron, probably in an appropriate structure to protect the equipment. But, Bell from CHS has approached the town for use of the engine for the CHS, and I heard that there is another effort to have the equipment moved to the Ridgway museum. So, a lot of things happening all at once, and the position of the city is that they don't have any money to spend on the equipment. He who has the deepest pockets, and not necesarily the best solution, just might win.
Subject Author Posted

C&S 71 and 60

Matthew April 16, 2005 05:24PM

Re: C&S 71 and 60

John Kyler April 16, 2005 05:35PM

Re: C&S 71 and 60

Mike Trent April 17, 2005 12:05PM

Re: C&S 71 and 60

Hobosteve April 18, 2005 08:29AM

Re: C&S 71 and 60

Jim Poston April 20, 2005 09:00AM

Re: C&S 71 and 60

fritz Klinke April 20, 2005 11:25PM

D&RGW # 278

Hobosteve April 21, 2005 12:34AM

Re: D&RGW # 278

fritz Klinke April 21, 2005 02:49AM

Re: D&RGW # 278

Matthew April 21, 2005 11:42AM

Sounds to me like a... *NM* *PIC*

Ed Kelley April 21, 2005 10:39PM

Re: Sounds to me like a...

Daniel Maxwell April 21, 2005 11:08PM

Re: C&S 60/ car replicas

Hobosteve April 21, 2005 12:31AM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.