Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Weight Distribution- NOT Weight Difference

PRSL
February 23, 2005 06:47PM
When there is a dislike of the tracking of a locomotive like class K-37 on the D&S for example, has there ever been any experimenting of changing the weight distribution onto the pilot wheels or trailer wheels? There could also be changes made in the springs and linkage which will draw the frame over when the pilot wheels turn into a curve, stronger or weaker. Over age, leaf spring change with service and create a entirely different per axle distribution than was originally designed by the skill of the builder, such as Baldwin and their years of experience. I would imagine that small railroads like D&S, which has no axle scales, has never considered redistribution of more or less engine weight to different axles.
A few winters ago I was sadden to see a steam engine dead at Mt. Dora, FL because it burned up the bearing on the front pilot wheel axle on one of its few trips to Orlando. It was never repaired. From what I saw, I would judge the leaf spring over the drivers sagged by age and because of equalizing linkage, excessive engine weight was relayed onto the pilot axle bearings, causing them to overheat and be destroyed. Simple study and a little wedge blocking could have corrected the weight distribution.
Those springs that are involved in the swivel of the pilot and trailing trucks could be adjusted to improve the steering and track ability of the K-37s.
Subject Author Posted

Years of Service

Josh McNeal February 16, 2005 12:13PM

Re: Years of Service

Dave Dye February 16, 2005 07:13PM

Re: Years of Service

Paul Hagglund February 16, 2005 09:44PM

Re: Years of Service

Dave Dye February 17, 2005 07:35PM

Re: Years of Service

William Reed February 17, 2005 03:05AM

Re: Years of Service

Kevin Cook February 17, 2005 08:29AM

497 & D&S engines

Josh McNeal February 17, 2005 12:28PM

Re: 497 & D&S engines

Paul Hagglund February 17, 2005 03:44PM

Re: 497 & D&S engines

The Josh February 17, 2005 05:41PM

Re: 497 & D&S engines

Paul Hagglund February 17, 2005 07:31PM

Re: 497 & D&S engines

El A & W February 17, 2005 08:58PM

Re: 497 & D&S engines

Paul Hagglund February 17, 2005 10:56PM

Re: 497 & D&S engines

El A & W February 18, 2005 09:48PM

Re: 497 & D&S engines

The Josh February 19, 2005 04:51PM

Re: 497 & D&S engines *PIC*

Dave Dye February 17, 2005 07:28PM

Re: 497 & D&S engines

Rob Gardner February 19, 2005 11:06AM

Re: 497 & D&S engines

C. Irvin February 19, 2005 03:47PM

Re: 497 & D&S engines

John Cole February 19, 2005 05:59PM

Re: 497 & D&S engines

Jack February 19, 2005 09:59PM

Re: 497 & D&S engines

earl February 20, 2005 01:21PM

Questions???

William Reed February 21, 2005 08:08PM

Re: Questions???

earl February 22, 2005 03:12PM

Re: Questions???

Jack February 22, 2005 04:57PM

Weight Difference

Rich Muth February 22, 2005 05:41PM

Re: Weight Distribution- NOT Weight Difference

PRSL February 23, 2005 06:47PM

Re: Weight Distribution- NOT Weight Difference

Paul Gibbs February 24, 2005 09:03AM

Earl being nice, doesn't swing at my pitches. *NM*

PRSL February 25, 2005 05:56AM

Re: Earl being nice, doesn't swing at my pitches.

Paul Gibbs February 25, 2005 07:35AM

Re: Earl being nice, doesn't swing at my pitches.

earl February 25, 2005 03:25PM

Re: Earl being nice, doesn't swing at my pitches.

Paul Gibbs February 25, 2005 04:05PM

Mt Dora........

poppason February 25, 2005 10:12AM

Re: Mt Dora........

John Hillier February 25, 2005 11:33AM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.