Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: C-16 No. 268 Tender

February 14, 2005 07:52AM
Sorry if my response offended you. But for some of us, this question has been hanging around for more than 30 years. I have written the history of 268 and 278 and they have been published several times. The question has been answered a number of times on this list and other places. It just keeps coming up again and again.
It is responses like this that have driven a number of folks with a lot of historical data to put it back in the box in their basement and watch football or NASCAR.
Subject Author Posted

C-16 No. 268 Tender

Kenneth Milner February 11, 2005 05:15PM

Re: C-16 No. 268 Tender

Paul Gibbs February 11, 2005 05:59PM

Re: C-16 No. 268 Tender

Kenneth Milner February 11, 2005 08:04PM

Re: C-16 No. 268 Tender

Fred February 11, 2005 10:47PM

Re: C-16 No. 268 Tender

Jerry Day February 12, 2005 01:12PM

Re: C-16 No. 268 Tender

Fred February 12, 2005 02:13PM

Re: C-16 No. 268 Tender

Dennis O'Berry February 12, 2005 05:07PM

Re: C-16 No. 268 Tender

Fred February 12, 2005 06:33PM

Re: C-16 No. 268 Tender

Paul Gibbs February 12, 2005 09:02PM

Re: C-16 No. 268 Tender

Jerry Day February 12, 2005 07:44PM

Re: C-16 No. 268 Tender

Kenneth Milner February 13, 2005 08:52PM

Re: C-16 No. 268 Tender

Mike Stillwell February 14, 2005 06:34AM

Re: C-16 No. 268 Tender

Jerry Day February 14, 2005 07:52AM

Re: C-16 No. 268 Tender

Bill Dennehy February 14, 2005 08:37AM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.