Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: C-16 No. 268 Tender

February 11, 2005 05:59PM
Mal Ferrell is wrong on this one. The tender is the same as before the Worlds Fair but was reskinned to have a nice side with a vertical top and no patches. I don't have proof of this on paper but if you look at the rivet patterns inside the coal bunker you can see where it was spliced. Also if you look at the tender before '49 you can see that the long rear deck is present even then helping prove that the loco didn't get a new tender just a new skin on the old one.
Mal Ferrell is wrong about 278's tender too, it had it long before '39, also it was a standard C class tender and several other C-16's had one like it. I think that I saw a picture of 278 with its current tender around 1910(?). Other than this the articles have been great, a good history of the C-16's.
Paul
Subject Author Posted

C-16 No. 268 Tender

Kenneth Milner February 11, 2005 05:15PM

Re: C-16 No. 268 Tender

Paul Gibbs February 11, 2005 05:59PM

Re: C-16 No. 268 Tender

Kenneth Milner February 11, 2005 08:04PM

Re: C-16 No. 268 Tender

Fred February 11, 2005 10:47PM

Re: C-16 No. 268 Tender

Jerry Day February 12, 2005 01:12PM

Re: C-16 No. 268 Tender

Fred February 12, 2005 02:13PM

Re: C-16 No. 268 Tender

Dennis O'Berry February 12, 2005 05:07PM

Re: C-16 No. 268 Tender

Fred February 12, 2005 06:33PM

Re: C-16 No. 268 Tender

Paul Gibbs February 12, 2005 09:02PM

Re: C-16 No. 268 Tender

Jerry Day February 12, 2005 07:44PM

Re: C-16 No. 268 Tender

Kenneth Milner February 13, 2005 08:52PM

Re: C-16 No. 268 Tender

Mike Stillwell February 14, 2005 06:34AM

Re: C-16 No. 268 Tender

Jerry Day February 14, 2005 07:52AM

Re: C-16 No. 268 Tender

Bill Dennehy February 14, 2005 08:37AM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.