Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: C-16 No. 268 Tender

February 11, 2005 08:04PM
Paul - Thanks so much for this interesting information. Mallory did state that it "appears" to have come from a K-27. I suppose if he could be misled I shouldn't feel so bad. With this bit of information then my original hypothosis was correct. The tender frame and floor is longer than normal thus accounting for extended deck behind the tank. Wanting to build this tender accurately in 1:20.3 so wanted to get things straight.
Thanks again - Kenneth
Subject Author Posted

C-16 No. 268 Tender

Kenneth Milner February 11, 2005 05:15PM

Re: C-16 No. 268 Tender

Paul Gibbs February 11, 2005 05:59PM

Re: C-16 No. 268 Tender

Kenneth Milner February 11, 2005 08:04PM

Re: C-16 No. 268 Tender

Fred February 11, 2005 10:47PM

Re: C-16 No. 268 Tender

Jerry Day February 12, 2005 01:12PM

Re: C-16 No. 268 Tender

Fred February 12, 2005 02:13PM

Re: C-16 No. 268 Tender

Dennis O'Berry February 12, 2005 05:07PM

Re: C-16 No. 268 Tender

Fred February 12, 2005 06:33PM

Re: C-16 No. 268 Tender

Paul Gibbs February 12, 2005 09:02PM

Re: C-16 No. 268 Tender

Jerry Day February 12, 2005 07:44PM

Re: C-16 No. 268 Tender

Kenneth Milner February 13, 2005 08:52PM

Re: C-16 No. 268 Tender

Mike Stillwell February 14, 2005 06:34AM

Re: C-16 No. 268 Tender

Jerry Day February 14, 2005 07:52AM

Re: C-16 No. 268 Tender

Bill Dennehy February 14, 2005 08:37AM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.