Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: D&RGW 223

February 14, 2005 07:13AM
Looking at a couple of books I found references to 32° curves on branch lines that were C-16 only, so that is probably the absolute minimum. Probably would run better on a bit wider radius though.
Paul
Subject Author Posted

D&RGW 223

Jerry Day February 11, 2005 01:57PM

Re: D&RGW 223

Eugene February 11, 2005 04:18PM

Re: D&RGW 223

PRSL February 11, 2005 04:42PM

Re: D&RGW 223

Jerry Day February 11, 2005 05:03PM

Re: D&RGW 223

Paul Gibbs February 11, 2005 06:11PM

Re: D&RGW 223

chris ahrens February 11, 2005 11:05PM

Re: D&RGW 223,- const. ng track

PRSL February 12, 2005 11:25AM

Re: D&RGW 223

Fred February 12, 2005 03:16PM

Re: D&RGW 223

PRSL February 12, 2005 08:30PM

Re: D&RGW 223

Paul Gibbs February 14, 2005 07:13AM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.