Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: D&RGW 223

February 11, 2005 11:05PM
Sorry guys, don't remember max radius curve for the C engines.
Some of the tightest curves on Marshall were around 24deg. Any of the K could get around these. And I believe there is one curve at GTL that is 30deg. But since the C&S favored the 2 middle drivers blind (2-8-0s) but with false flanges, and they were able to go around that particular curve at a reduced speed.
However, with the blind drivers & slow speed, some lubrication, no reason that 30Deg couldn't be negotiated. Those "shop" moves are much different than regular service. Oh ya, if tight curve is necessary, you may want to open the gauge up somewhat to ease the movement.
But beware, when Knotts Berry Farm was first constructed the story goes that the original layout was engineered by an hired ATSF track engineering crew. The curves were so tight the first C-19 trying to "get around it" derailed. Needless to say, everythinging had to be re-engineered and re-constructed. So much for sharp pencils.
Chris
Subject Author Posted

D&RGW 223

Jerry Day February 11, 2005 01:57PM

Re: D&RGW 223

Eugene February 11, 2005 04:18PM

Re: D&RGW 223

PRSL February 11, 2005 04:42PM

Re: D&RGW 223

Jerry Day February 11, 2005 05:03PM

Re: D&RGW 223

Paul Gibbs February 11, 2005 06:11PM

Re: D&RGW 223

chris ahrens February 11, 2005 11:05PM

Re: D&RGW 223,- const. ng track

PRSL February 12, 2005 11:25AM

Re: D&RGW 223

Fred February 12, 2005 03:16PM

Re: D&RGW 223

PRSL February 12, 2005 08:30PM

Re: D&RGW 223

Paul Gibbs February 14, 2005 07:13AM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.