Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Protecting rebuilt cars from the elements

Dan Robirds
September 09, 2004 11:57AM
Every preservation group (especially those with wood equipment) has the same basic problem. After you have spent all the effort to repaint or rebuild a piece of rail equipment, it is left outside in the weather. The normal reaction is - Let's build a building to put it in and protect it! But that creates another series of problems. Now you have to find scarce funding and/or volunteers to build and maintain structures in addition to preserving rail equipment.
99% of rail equipment in the last 160+ years has spent 99% of its time outdoors in the weather. How really historicaly accurate is a perfect and pristinly painted piece of rolling stock?
In my opinion, instead of concentrating on acres of covered storage, priority should be given to:
1. Obviously, secure and covered storage should be available for any historic rail equipment that would otherwised be stripped bare by thieves or destroyed by weather.
2. Enough useable shop space should be available so that active supported projects can be completed with the greatest efficiency. Each group should develop the shop capability to at least repaint every locomotive or passenger car every 5 years, and others within 10 years. This refers to equipment that is still in good condition or has been previously had substantial work. This is in addition to the major project or continuing operations work.
3. Sufficient space should be allowed to publicly display and protect the "gems" of the collection in an appropriate setting. Please folks - Take a little extra time and money here to do this right. Years ago, Carson City (NV State RR Museum) put up a concrete block public display building that looks just like I described it. Too bad they didn't use split-face block (more stone appearance than concrete block)and followed a style reminicent of the now gone Carson Enginehouse. Instead of putting the offices/restrooms/gift shop/etc. addition in front the building, they should have put it the back or end. This would have allowed the displayed equipment to be visible through a face of large arched windows across the front. Imagine the view from Hwy 395 passing by at night! And the CHS at the Loop - what were they thinking?
What is the real priority - Having the capability to rebuild and maintain rail history; or just collect and warehouse it?
Subject Author Posted

C&TS 5-year plan

Douglas vV September 08, 2004 02:20AM

Re: C&TS 5-year plan

Kevin Bush September 08, 2004 01:59PM

Re: Or should I meant to say......thinking. *NM*

Kevin Bush September 08, 2004 04:05PM

Re: C&TS 5-year plan

Paul Hagglund September 08, 2004 10:41PM

Re: C&TS 5-year plan

Cdaspit September 09, 2004 06:02AM

Re: C&TS 5-year plan

Frank Stapleton September 11, 2004 10:37PM

Re: C&TS 5-year plan

Kevin Bush September 12, 2004 12:23AM

Re: C&TS 5-year plan--passenger car problem

Andy Roth September 09, 2004 08:13AM

Re: C&TS 5-year plan--passenger car problem

Gary Waite September 09, 2004 09:58AM

Re: C&TS 5-year plan--passenger car problem

Ted Miles September 09, 2004 10:13AM

Protecting rebuilt cars from the elements

Dan Robirds September 09, 2004 11:57AM

Re: C&TS 5-year plan--passenger car problem

Andy Roth September 09, 2004 01:00PM

Re: C&TS 5-year plan--passenger car problem

John Sporseen September 09, 2004 06:43PM

Re: C&TS 5-year plan--passenger car problem

Brian Norden September 09, 2004 07:33PM

Re: C&TS passenger cars & trucks

Andy Roth September 10, 2004 01:26PM

Re: C&TS passenger cars & trucks

John Sporseen September 10, 2004 08:24PM

Re: C&TS passenger cars & trucks

Yosemite Sam September 10, 2004 10:25PM

Re: C&TS passenger cars & trucks

andt roth September 10, 2004 10:28PM

Re: C&TS passenger cars & trucks

John Sporseen September 11, 2004 09:41AM

Re: C&TS passenger cars & trucks

John Sporseen September 11, 2004 12:19PM

Re: C&TS passenger cars & trucks

Jeff Chittick September 11, 2004 04:43PM

Re: C&TS passenger cars & trucks

Stevo del Applegato September 12, 2004 07:08AM

Re: C&TS passenger cars & trucks

John Sporseen September 12, 2004 08:32AM

Re: C&TS passenger cars & trucks

John Sporseen September 12, 2004 08:33AM

Re: C&TS passenger cars & trucks

SZuiderveen September 12, 2004 08:58AM

Re: C&TS passenger cars & trucks

Ed Stabler September 12, 2004 10:40AM

Re: C&TS passenger cars & trucks

Paul Hagglund September 12, 2004 10:36PM

Re: C&TS passenger cars & trucks

John Sporseen September 12, 2004 11:32PM

Roller bearings

Douglas vV September 13, 2004 12:22AM

Re: C&TS passenger cars & trucks *LINK*

John Sporseen September 13, 2004 12:16AM

Re: C&TS passenger cars & trucks

John Sporseen September 13, 2004 09:15AM

Re: C&TS passenger cars & trucks

Jeff A. September 13, 2004 01:22PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.