Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Proposed RGS 2-8-8-2

March 07, 2024 09:47AM
I don't have a builders card for a C-21, I pulled this off of drgw.org


Denver & Rio Grande
Locomotive History
Last Update: 09/03/2000
Road: Denver & Rio Grande Road #: 430
From: 1916 To: 1924 Class: 93 Gauge: N
Acquired: Used Name:
Builder: Baldwin, # 17872, 1900 Wt: 95650 Tract. Eff.: 20686
Wheel Arr.: 2-8-0 Cylinders: 17x20 Drivers: 38.88
Disposition: Re-classified & renumbered
Photographs:
Drawings:
Notes: Reference [15] states that this engine, along with 431 (CR-102) and 432 (CR-103) were standard gauge locomotives that were converted to narrow gauge by the D&RG.;
Road: Denver & Rio Grande Western Road #: 360
From: 1924 To: 1950 Class: C21 Gauge: N
Acquired: Used Name:
Builder: Baldwin, # 17872, 1916 Wt: 95650 Tract. Eff.: 20686
Wheel Arr.: 2-8-0 Cylinders: 17x20 Drivers: 38.88
Disposition: Dismantled Salida 8/7/1950


Denver & Rio Grande
Locomotive History
Last Update: 09/03/2000
Road: Denver & Rio Grande Road #: 431
From: 1916 To: 1924 Class: 93 Gauge: N
Acquired: Used Name:
Builder: Baldwin, # 17717, 1900 Wt: 95650 Tract. Eff.: 20686
Wheel Arr.: 2-8-0 Cylinders: 17x20 Drivers: 38.88
Disposition: Re-classified & renumbered


Drawings:
Notes: Reference [15] states that this engine, along with 430 (CR-101) and 432 (CR-103) were standard gauge locomotives that were converted to narrow gauge by the D&RG.;
Road: Denver & Rio Grande Western Road #: 361
From: 1924 To: 1951 Class: C21 Gauge: N
Acquired: Used Name:
Builder: Baldwin, # 17717, 1916 Wt: 95650 Tract. Eff.: 20686
Wheel Arr.: 2-8-0 Cylinders: 17x20 Drivers: 38.88
Disposition: Dismantled Pueblo 11/15/1951
]

[web.archive.org]

Still a Student,

Dave



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/07/2024 09:50AM by davidtltc.
Subject Author Posted

Proposed RGS 2-8-8-2 Attachments

Jimmy Blouch March 06, 2024 04:10PM

Re: Proposed RGS 2-8-8-2

Earl March 06, 2024 04:45PM

Re: Proposed RGS 2-8-8-2

John K March 07, 2024 05:52AM

Re: Proposed RGS 2-8-8-2

The Train Tracker March 06, 2024 05:02PM

Re: Proposed RGS 2-8-8-2

The Old Boomer March 06, 2024 06:45PM

Re: Proposed RGS 2-8-8-2

DanS March 06, 2024 06:59PM

Re: Proposed RGS 2-8-8-2

The Old Boomer March 06, 2024 07:36PM

Re: Proposed RGS 2-8-8-2

heatermason March 06, 2024 08:38PM

Re: Proposed RGS 2-8-8-2

The Old Boomer March 07, 2024 06:15AM

Re: Proposed RGS 2-8-8-2

nickgully March 06, 2024 08:19PM

Re: Proposed RGS 2-8-8-2

Brian Norden March 06, 2024 09:15PM

Re: Proposed RGS 2-8-8-2

John Hewlett March 06, 2024 09:48PM

Re: Proposed RGS 2-8-8-2

davidtltc March 07, 2024 07:32AM

Re: Proposed RGS 2-8-8-2

Earl March 07, 2024 09:39AM

Re: Proposed RGS 2-8-8-2

John K March 07, 2024 09:18AM

Re: Proposed RGS 2-8-8-2

davidtltc March 07, 2024 09:47AM

Re: Proposed RGS 2-8-8-2

Jeff Taylor March 07, 2024 06:52PM

Re: Proposed RGS 2-8-8-2

davidtltc March 08, 2024 10:49AM

Re: Proposed RGS 2-8-8-2

Earl March 08, 2024 12:30PM

Re: Proposed RGS 2-8-8-2

John K March 08, 2024 07:39PM

Re: Proposed RGS 2-8-8-2

Earl March 08, 2024 12:59PM

Re: Proposed RGS 2-8-8-2

John K March 08, 2024 07:34PM

Re: Proposed RGS 2-8-8-2

Rick Steele March 11, 2024 06:16PM

Re: Proposed RGS 2-8-8-2

RDannemann March 13, 2024 10:48AM

Re: Proposed RGS 2-8-8-2

Earl March 13, 2024 12:30PM

Re: Proposed RGS 2-8-8-2

Rick Steele March 13, 2024 02:32PM

Re: Proposed RGS 2-8-8-2

John K March 13, 2024 08:08PM

Re: Proposed RGS 2-8-8-2

Andrew Roth April 10, 2024 07:05AM

Re: Proposed RGS 2-8-8-2

Kelly Anderson March 14, 2024 03:34PM

Re: Proposed RGS 2-8-8-2

trainrider47 March 21, 2024 12:35PM

Re: Proposed RGS 2-8-8-2

Kelly Anderson March 21, 2024 05:10PM

Re: Proposed RGS 2-8-8-2

trainrider47 March 21, 2024 05:49PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login