Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

"Do it for the Children!"

July 12, 2004 06:48PM
"The BCRHS board put the idea to all of the people who have volunteered on #30/74 over the years, and their responses can be seen on the link Chris Weaver posted above."
Jason, you must have meant all those who have worked on #30/74 since you have been involved as the BCRHS. Indeed, the three responses from those you worked with on this project are positive in nature, and as Adam(?) states, "if the goal is to run, then this is THE chance".
In the years in which I was involved with the care and preservation of the train in the 1980's I would wager that both my time and personal financial investment would at least rival your own. My goal, and the goal of the dozens of others who also volunteered their time and money to the project was to maintain the display for the City and the people of Boulder. Operation was not a realistic goal at the time.
While I support the ultimate goal of complete restoration if possible, my primary interest would be to see the equipment restored to where it is at least complete, if non operable.
No one understands better than I do how our limited but focused plan of painting, patching and applying band-aids where we could to stave off the ravages of time and vandalism had run its course. Huge financial resources are needed to just restore the train to the point where it could exist in the future as a "stuffed and mounted" display in Central Park. You and your group are to be commended for the thankless work you have done to date, and the work you have planned for the future. One day your work and contributions will fade and you won't mind any more than we did, glory is not a reward for this kind of work.
I must say with respect to the current issue at hand, that I have no confidence in the City of Boulder's eventual acceptance of an operating steam locomotive within it's City Limits. Why, the very notion, as I have stated here before, that anyone would be allowed to approach a live steam engine in today's Boulder without wearing a complete and full Biohazard suit is to deny current reality. And this doesn't even begin to address the inevitable arguements of how many abortions could be funded or starving childred fed or teachers added to educate the minds of our increasingly addled youth or how many prarie dogs relocated and counseled with $250,000. My God, man. Where are your priorities? And besides that, what of the restoration of the Golden Buffalo football program to National dominance?
But I'm not all doom and gloom. I actually have the strategy for the "solution". The final answer to which there can be no retort from even the most fervent of Boulder's opposition.
It's for the children, you see. That's why the train needs to be restored. It's for the children. The answer, as the song says, "Is Blowin' in the Wind". Children love the smell of coal smoke. Even if it has to be filtered through a gas mask. And a live steam engine is like nothing else, even if it has to be viewed through protective goggles.
Good luck Jason, and the rest of y'all. You're going to need it, and if the CHS wants to throw money at #30/74, why stand in the way?
Mike Trent (#74's chief caretaker 1980-1988)
Subject Author Posted

Boulder May Send Vintage Train To Georgetown

John July 11, 2004 08:27PM

Re: Boulder May Send Vintage Train To Georgetown *LINK*

Mike Trent July 11, 2004 08:54PM

Daily Camera Article *LINK*

Chris Weaver July 11, 2004 09:00PM

Re: Daily Camera Article

John July 11, 2004 09:10PM

Re: Dealing with the Devil

Skip Luke July 11, 2004 09:17PM

Re: Dealing with the Devil

Douglas vV July 11, 2004 09:34PM

Re: Dealing with the Devil

Fred Garvin July 11, 2004 10:02PM

The Devil would be easier

John West July 11, 2004 10:33PM

Re: Dealing with the Devil

Skip Luke July 12, 2004 08:13PM

Re: Dealing with the Devil

Douglas vV July 12, 2004 09:28PM

Re: Daily Camera Article

CopCarSS July 12, 2004 10:33AM

It Is Rotten, and it's Nothing to Worry About

Mike Trent July 12, 2004 09:52PM

Re: Boulder Legal Issues with #74/30

Andy Roth July 13, 2004 06:39AM

Re: Boulder May Send Vintage Train To Georgetown *LINK*

Chris Weaver July 11, 2004 09:06PM

Re: Boulder May Send Vintage Train To Georgetown

J. B. Bowers July 11, 2004 10:00PM

Next to the trough

Don Richter July 12, 2004 07:56AM

Re: Next to the trough

Jason Midyette July 12, 2004 09:00AM

Re: Next to the trough

Wooly July 12, 2004 09:18AM

Re: Next to the trough

Don Richter July 12, 2004 09:38AM

Re: Boulder May Send Vintage Train To Georgetown

Jason Midyette July 11, 2004 11:16PM

I HAVE IT!!!!

M. R. Cooltrains July 12, 2004 11:05AM

They have it, too.....

Mike Trent July 12, 2004 06:54PM

Re: They have it, too.....

Skip Luke July 12, 2004 08:23PM

They have it, too big

Dave S. July 12, 2004 08:25PM

Re: They have it, too big

Skip Luke July 12, 2004 08:32PM

Oh - don't forget the cuts!.

Skip Luke July 12, 2004 08:29PM

Re: Oh - don't forget the cuts!.

Mike Trent July 12, 2004 09:30PM

Re: Oh - don't forget the cuts!.

Douglas vV July 12, 2004 09:38PM

Blind Drivers!

Kevin Cook July 12, 2004 10:21PM

Re: Oh - don't forget the cuts!.

Skip Luke July 13, 2004 08:38PM

Re: Boulder May Send Vintage Train To Georgetown

Andy Roth July 12, 2004 01:02PM

Re: Boulder May Send Vintage Train To Georgetown

Jason Midyette July 12, 2004 07:07PM

"Do it for the Children!"

Mike Trent July 12, 2004 06:48PM

Re: "Do it for the Children!"

Tim Schreiner July 12, 2004 08:35PM

Re: "Do it for the Children!"

Rick Steele July 13, 2004 07:03AM

Do it for Thomas !!!

Rodger Polley July 13, 2004 08:54PM

Re: Boulder May Send Vintage Train To Georgetown

Rick Steele July 13, 2004 07:13AM

Re: Boulder May Send Vintage Train To Georgetown

Steve Stockham July 13, 2004 04:18PM

Re: Boulder May Send Vintage Train To Georgetown

John July 12, 2004 11:36AM

Historically inaccurate restoration?

Dale W. Brown July 14, 2004 12:00AM

Re: Historically inaccurate restoration?

Paul Hagglund July 15, 2004 03:08PM

Re: Historically inaccurate restoration?

Dale W. Brown July 15, 2004 09:19PM

Re: Historically inaccurate restoration?

Paul Hagglund July 15, 2004 09:57PM

Re: Historically inaccurate restoration?

Skip Luke July 16, 2004 11:34PM

Re: Historically inaccurate restoration?

Paul Hagglund July 17, 2004 12:00AM

Re: Historically inaccurate restoration?

Skip Luke July 17, 2004 11:56PM

Re: Historically inaccurate restoration?

Paul Hagglund July 18, 2004 03:23PM

Re: Historically inaccurate restoration?

Skip Luke July 18, 2004 10:00PM

Re: Historically inaccurate restoration?

Paul Hagglund July 18, 2004 11:27PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.