Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Bridge 329C or 328A on the 3rd division

January 12, 2021 01:21PM
Opps sorry You are correct typo on my part

The 1891 plans identify the bridge as 329C on the 3rd division. This bridge looks identical to what most photos refer to as bridge 328A which is the bridge that the National Park display is on.

So my question as to why the difference in identification.

Thanks

Stan
Subject Author Posted

Bridge 329C or 328A on the 3rd division

stanames January 11, 2021 03:41PM

Re: Bridge 529C or 528A

hank January 12, 2021 08:08AM

Re: Bridge 329C or 328A on the 3rd division

stanames January 12, 2021 01:21PM

Re: Bridge 329C or 328A on the 3rd division

hank January 12, 2021 06:24PM

To add to the confusion (was :Re: Bridge 329C or 328A on the 3rd division)

hank January 13, 2021 08:27AM

Re: Bridge 329C or 328A on the 3rd division Attachments

Chris Walker January 12, 2021 04:15PM

Re: Bridge 329C or 328A on the 3rd division

risrwy January 12, 2021 05:48PM

Re: Bridge 329C or 328A on the 3rd division

Chris Walker January 12, 2021 06:47PM

Little Cimarron? (was: Re: Bridge 329C or 328A on the 3rd division)

hank January 12, 2021 06:14PM

Re: Little Cimarron? (was: Re: Bridge 329C or 328A on the 3rd division)

Chris Walker January 12, 2021 06:52PM

Re: Bridge 329C or 328A on the 3rd division

stanames January 12, 2021 06:48PM

Re: Bridge 329C or 328A on the 3rd division

Chris Walker January 12, 2021 06:54PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login