Re: Bridge 529C or 528A

stanames Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I am a little confused
>
> I am looking at plans from 1891 of bridge 529C on
> the 3rd division.

Well, to begin with, MP 529 would be in Utah somewhere[1], not on the 3rd division! Actually, in 1891 there would have been no MP 529 on the D&RG since the D&RGW RY had gained it's independence in 1886 and then become the RGW in 1889!

Perhaps you meant to type 329C?

Hank

[1] Around Little Grand siding (between Crescent and Solitude) using the mileage via the original line, about a mile West of Thompson via the new lines of 1890.