Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: What the C&TS Interstate Compact actually states

December 01, 2020 02:08PM
Russo Loco Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Greg Scholl Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I know the 315 and 463 usually are lettered Rio
> > Grande in some fashion, but maybe we can get
> > one more K-36 with the Flying Rio Grande in
> reg-
> > ular service.  It would be a historic thing
> to point
> > out by the docents to those riding.
>
>
> Right On, Greg -
>
> Since the old-style 'Denver & Rio Grande Western'
> lettering is well-represented, I'd like to see
> #489 with the flying 'Rio Grande' logo, and
> #484 with Ernie's original four-inch, or at least
> the six-inch 'abbreviated' "Cumbres &
> Toltec Scenic RR" lettering as a testament
> to the ongoing history of the railroad. 
> After all, the engines have now been owned by the
> C&TS longer than they were by the D&RGW.
>
> - Roosso


And if you are going to letter them C&TS why not do one with the tri-color herald like Ernie did on the first engine....mayb that's what you are referring to Russ. One like that would be nice, and one or two Rio Grande would be nice. We have the 40's style I think on 463, unless it now has flying Rio Grande....don't recall that one. Anyway lots of options for historically correct D&RGW and C&TS. Probably good to have both in a historically accurate era spanning two railroads, but with the same engines!!
Greg
Subject Author Posted

What the C&TS Interstate Compact actually states

Brian Shoup November 30, 2020 02:22PM

Re: What the C&TS Interstate Compact actually states

hank November 30, 2020 03:03PM

What is correct and what is incorrect

Brian Shoup November 30, 2020 03:50PM

Re: What is correct and what is incorrect

Rich Muth November 30, 2020 04:01PM

Re: What is correct and what is incorrect

Brian Norden November 30, 2020 11:07PM

Re: What is correct and what is incorrect

hank December 01, 2020 09:35AM

Re: What is correct and what is incorrect

Johnson Barr December 01, 2020 01:25PM

Re: What the C&TS Interstate Compact actually states

Russo Loco November 30, 2020 06:01PM

Re: What the C&TS Interstate Compact actually states

Greg Scholl November 30, 2020 07:40PM

Re: What the C&TS Interstate Compact actually states

Russo Loco November 30, 2020 10:45PM

Re: What the C&TS Interstate Compact actually states

Greg Scholl December 01, 2020 02:08PM

Re: What the C&TS tenders actually looked like in the "Olden Days" Attachments

Russo Loco December 01, 2020 08:30PM

Re: What the C&TS tenders actually looked like in the "Olden Days"

Earl December 01, 2020 09:07PM

Re: What the C&TS tenders actually looked like in the "Olden Days"

Tank Smith December 02, 2020 06:55AM

Re: What the C&TS tenders actually looked like in the "Olden Days"

Russo Loco December 02, 2020 12:47PM

Re: What the C&TS tenders actually looked like in the "Olden Days"

Tank Smith December 02, 2020 02:15PM

Re: What the C&TS tenders actually looked like in the "Olden Days"

Russo Loco December 02, 2020 02:37PM

Re: What the C&TS tenders actually looked like in the "Olden Days" Attachments

Tank Smith December 03, 2020 11:56AM

[moved]

IanLK March 10, 2021 08:35PM

Re: Herald and logo licenses

Scott Gibbs December 02, 2020 07:38AM

Re: What the C&TS Interstate Compact actually states

gregcoit December 01, 2020 08:29AM

Re: What the C&TS Interstate Compact actually states

gregcoit December 01, 2020 08:30AM

Thanks Greg, but the research was done in 2003

Brian Shoup December 02, 2020 10:49PM

Re: What the C&TS Interstate Compact actually states

guymonmd December 02, 2020 08:46AM

Re: What the C&TS Interstate Compact actually states

redrob December 02, 2020 12:21PM

Landmark Status, doesn't The Silverton have that too?

hank December 03, 2020 09:28AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login